patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: "Ye, MingjinX" <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	"Zhou, YidingX" <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Ke1X" <ke1x.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] net/ice: fix ice dcf control thread crash
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 11:55:19 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4PR11MB599416FAA7577FE38FF3E687D7819@DM4PR11MB5994.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <SN7PR11MB7139AC7EE56D1EE38616CB89E5819@SN7PR11MB7139.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 21, 2023 10:08 AM
> To: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Zhou, YidingX
> <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Zhang, Ke1X <ke1x.zhang@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] net/ice: fix ice dcf control thread crash
> 
> Hi Qi, here is my new solution, can you give me some good suggestions.
> 1. remove the 'vc_event_msg_cb == NULL' related processing and let each
> 'ice-rest' thread, end normally.
> 2. Define vsi_update_thread_num as rte_atomic32_t.
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Zhang, Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> > Sent: 2023年3月20日 20:53
> > To: Ye, MingjinX <mingjinx.ye@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: Yang, Qiming <qiming.yang@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Zhou,
> > YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Zhang, Ke1X <ke1x.zhang@intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v5] net/ice: fix ice dcf control thread crash
> 
> > >  	for (;;) {
> > > +		if (hw->vc_event_msg_cb == NULL)
> > > +			break;
> > Can you explain why this is required, seems it not related with your
> > commit log
> The purpose of this is to bring all 'ice-reset' threads to a quick end when hw
> is released.

I don't understand, the vc_event_msg_cb was initialized in ice_dcf_dev_init and never be reset why we need this check, anything I missed?
> 
> > >
> > > -	rte_intr_enable(pci_dev->intr_handle);
> > > -	ice_dcf_enable_irq0(hw);
> > > +	if (hw->vc_event_msg_cb != NULL) {
> > > +		rte_intr_enable(pci_dev->intr_handle);
> > > +		ice_dcf_enable_irq0(hw);
> >
> > Same question as above
> These are called when HW releases the resource. Therefore, there is no need
> to call.
> 
> > > +	rte_spinlock_lock(&dcf_hw->vsi_thread_lock);
> > > +	dcf_hw->vsi_update_thread_num++;
> > > +	rte_spinlock_unlock(&dcf_hw->vsi_thread_lock);
> >
> > I think you can define vsi_update_thread_num as rte_atomic32_t and use
> > rte_atomic32_add/sub
> At first I chose the rte_atomic32_t option, which is not very elegant using
> spinlock.
> The 'checkpatches.sh' script gives a warning ('Using rte_atomicNN_xxx') when
> it is executed. I saw the comment on line 89 of the script (# refrain from new
> additions of 16/32/64 bits rte_atomicNN_xxx()), so I went with the spinlock
> solution.

You are right, rte_atomicNN_xxx will be deprecated, and should not be used
We can use the gcc build-in function __atomic_fetch_add/sub as an alternative, sp

> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-21 11:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230213071648.326123-1-ke1x.zhang@intel.com>
2023-03-15  8:20 ` [PATCH v3] " Mingjin Ye
2023-03-15 13:06   ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-03-17  5:09   ` [PATCH v4] " Mingjin Ye
2023-03-17 10:15     ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-03-20  9:40     ` [PATCH v5] " Mingjin Ye
2023-03-20 12:52       ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-03-21  2:08         ` Ye, MingjinX
2023-03-21 11:55           ` Zhang, Qi Z [this message]
2023-03-21 16:24             ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-03-22  5:56       ` [PATCH v6] " Mingjin Ye
2023-04-03  6:54         ` Zhang, Qi Z
2023-04-11  2:08         ` [PATCH v7] " Mingjin Ye
2023-05-15  6:28           ` Zhang, Qi Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=DM4PR11MB599416FAA7577FE38FF3E687D7819@DM4PR11MB5994.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ke1x.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingjinx.ye@intel.com \
    --cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=yidingx.zhou@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).