From: Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>
To: "christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com"
<christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>,
Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>,
"benjamin.walker@intel.com" <benjamin.walker@intel.com>,
David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>,
Ian Stokes <ian.stokes@intel.com>,
Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
John McNamara <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>,
Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>, Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>,
"pingx.yu@intel.com" <pingx.yu@intel.com>,
"qian.q.xu@intel.com" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>,
Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>,
"NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL)" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"yuan.peng@intel.com" <yuan.peng@intel.com>,
"zhaoyan.chen@intel.com" <zhaoyan.chen@intel.com>
Subject: RE: 19.11.11 (RC2) patches review and test
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 13:47:06 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <DM4PR12MB51674A5CDF47CC871E96179DDA459@DM4PR12MB5167.namprd12.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211220075957.634283-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com
> <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
> Sent: Monday, December 20, 2021 10:00 AM
> To: stable@dpdk.org
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe <Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com>;
> Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>; Ali Alnubani <alialnu@nvidia.com>;
> benjamin.walker@intel.com; David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
> Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Ian Stokes
> <ian.stokes@intel.com>; Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>; John McNamara
> <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Ju-Hyoung Lee <juhlee@microsoft.com>;
> Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>;
> Pei Zhang <pezhang@redhat.com>; pingx.yu@intel.com;
> qian.q.xu@intel.com; Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@nvidia.com>; NBU-
> Contact-Thomas Monjalon (EXTERNAL) <thomas@monjalon.net>;
> yuan.peng@intel.com; zhaoyan.chen@intel.com
> Subject: 19.11.11 (RC2) patches review and test
>
> Hi all,
>
> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 19.11.11.
>
> The planned date for the final release is 7th January 2021.
>
> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report
> any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release
> the fixes and reported validations will be added to the release notes.
>
> This -rc2 is supposed to be functionally equivalent to the -rc1 version
> we had 11 days ago. The only fixes added since v19.11.11-rc1 are for
> typos (in comments) and to fix compilation issues on some kernels
> and newer toolchains. We still can't build everything with clang13 (19.11
> never built there, this is not a regression), but various issues blocking
> that are resolved already. The issues with SLES15 kernels are resolved as
> well as using LTO with gcc 10 is fixed.
>
> Therefore there is no strict need to rerun all tests on -rc2 - OTOH by all
> means if you have the time and capacity I'd absolutely appreciate if
> you could do so.
> What is important and should be tested are various builds, to ensure that
> none of these changes broke a build for those target platforms that worked
> before.
> And furthermore - if before you had further functional tests blocked by
> those build issues - then now you can build and run those further tests
> that were formerly blocked.
>
> List of fixed bugs since -rc1:
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=900
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=901
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=902
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=903
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=907
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=908
> - Build on FreeBSD 13 (had no bug number)
>
> Known and still remaining are:
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=904
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=905
> - https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912
>
> For everyone helping to fix so many of them already, thank you a lot!
> Maybe not on 19.11.11, if the joint efforts continue maybe 19.11.12
> will be able to resolve all these issues that are currently left.
> So keep the patches coming. Even after 19.11.11 is released I'll continue
> to enqueue your build fixes and since we just extended the lifetime of 19.11
> to three years there will be a 19.11.12 coming to pick them up.
>
Hi,
The following covers the functional tests that we ran on Nvidia hardware for this release:
- Basic functionality:
Send and receive multiple types of traffic.
- testpmd xstats counter test.
- testpmd timestamp test.
- Changing/checking link status through testpmd.
- RTE flow tests:
Items: eth / ipv4 / ipv6 / tcp / udp / icmp / gre / nvgre / geneve / vxlan / mplsoudp / mplsogre
Actions: drop / queue / rss / mark / flag / jump / count / raw_encap / raw_decap / vxlan_encap / vxlan_decap / NAT / dec_ttl
- Some RSS tests.
- VLAN filtering, stripping and insertion tests.
- Checksum and TSO tests.
- ptype tests.
- link_status_interrupt example application tests.
- l3fwd-power example application tests.
- Multi-process example applications tests.
Functional tests ran on:
- NIC: ConnectX-4 Lx / OS: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS / Driver: MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.5-1.0.3.2 / Firmware: 14.32.1010
- NIC: ConnectX-4 Lx / OS: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS / Kernel: 5.16.0-rc7 / Driver: rdma-core v38.0 / Firmware: 14.32.1010
- NIC: ConnectX-5 / OS: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS / Driver: MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.5-1.0.3.2 / Firmware: 16.32.1010
- NIC: ConnectX-5 / OS: Ubuntu 20.04 LTS / Kernel: 5.16.0-rc7 / Driver: v38.0 / Firmware: 16.32.1010
Compilation tests with multiple configurations in the following OS/driver combinations are also passing:
- Ubuntu 20.04.3 with MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.5-1.0.3.2.
- Ubuntu 20.04.3 with rdma-core master (c52b43e).
- Ubuntu 20.04.3 with rdma-core v28.0.
- Ubuntu 18.04.6 with rdma-core v17.1.
- Ubuntu 18.04.6 with rdma-core master (c52b43e) (i386).
- Ubuntu 16.04.7 with rdma-core v22.7.
- Fedora 35 with rdma-core v38.0 (passing except for make builds with clang, see: https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=912).
- Fedora 36 (Rawhide) with rdma-core v38.0
- CentOS 7 7.9.2009 with rdma-core master (940f53f).
- CentOS 7 7.9.2009 with MLNX_OFED_LINUX-5.5-1.0.3.2.
- CentOS 8 8.4.2105 with rdma-core master (940f53f).
- OpenSUSE Leap 15.3 with rdma-core v31.0.
We don't see any other new issues in this release.
Thanks,
Ali
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-12-30 13:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-12-20 7:59 christian.ehrhardt
2021-12-30 13:47 ` Ali Alnubani [this message]
2022-01-04 10:34 ` Christian Ehrhardt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=DM4PR12MB51674A5CDF47CC871E96179DDA459@DM4PR12MB5167.namprd12.prod.outlook.com \
--to=alialnu@nvidia.com \
--cc=Abhishek.Marathe@microsoft.com \
--cc=akhil.goyal@nxp.com \
--cc=benjamin.walker@intel.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
--cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=juhlee@microsoft.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=pezhang@redhat.com \
--cc=pingx.yu@intel.com \
--cc=qian.q.xu@intel.com \
--cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=yuan.peng@intel.com \
--cc=zhaoyan.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).