* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix usage print
[not found] ` <f624a6e4-f646-0f0f-0fdc-61b5c5bb4e6d@intel.com>
@ 2018-04-18 10:25 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: De Lara Guarch, Pablo @ 2018-04-18 10:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Nicolau, Radu, Anoob Joseph, Akhil Goyal, Doherty, Declan
Cc: Jerin Jacob, Narayana Prasad, dev, stable
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Radu Nicolau
> Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2018 10:02 AM
> To: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>; Akhil Goyal
> <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>; Doherty, Declan <declan.doherty@intel.com>
> Cc: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>; Narayana Prasad
> <narayanaprasad.athreya@caviumnetworks.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/ipsec-secgw: fix usage print
>
>
> On 4/16/2018 1:23 PM, Anoob Joseph wrote:
> > The usage print was not updated when jumbo frames & crypto_dev mask
> > support was added. Fixing that. Also, the optional arguments were not
> > properly highlighted in the usage header. This is also fixed.
> >
> > General cleanup of the usage print was also done to make it look more
> > cleaner and similar to what is existing in other applications like
> > l3fwd.
> >
> > Fixes: bbabfe6e4ee4 ("examples/ipsec_secgw: support jumbo frames")
> > Fixes: 2c68fe791538 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: add cryptodev mask
> > option")
> > Fixes: d299106e8e31 ("examples/ipsec-secgw: add IPsec sample
> > application")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anoob Joseph <anoob.joseph@caviumnetworks.com>
> > ---
> >
> Acked-by: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
> <mailto:radu.nicolau@intel.com>
Cc'ing stable list.
Applied to dpdk-next-crypto.
Thanks,
Pablo
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread