From: "You, KaisenX" <kaisenx.you@intel.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
"Yang, Qiming" <qiming.yang@intel.com>,
"Zhou, YidingX" <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>,
"Wu, Jingjing" <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
"Xing, Beilei" <beilei.xing@intel.com>,
"Zhang, Qi Z" <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>,
"Luca Boccassi" <bluca@debian.org>,
"Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>,
Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] net/iavf:fix slow memory allocation
Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2022 10:11:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SJ0PR11MB67653AD1614F9249EA65A5FEE1EA9@SJ0PR11MB6765.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8y2wBnjcTn3d=mj7-K1AF2Avb3LLjjNf1s6iQRe404qOg@mail.gmail.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
> Sent: 2022年12月20日 17:34
> To: You, KaisenX <kaisenx.you@intel.com>
> Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Burakov, Anatoly
> <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>; stable@dpdk.org; Yang, Qiming
> <qiming.yang@intel.com>; Zhou, YidingX <yidingx.zhou@intel.com>; Wu,
> Jingjing <jingjing.wu@intel.com>; Xing, Beilei <beilei.xing@intel.com>; Zhang,
> Qi Z <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>; Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>; Mcnamara,
> John <john.mcnamara@intel.com>; Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/iavf:fix slow memory allocation
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 7:52 AM You, KaisenX <kaisenx.you@intel.com>
> wrote:
> > > >> As to the reason for not using rte_malloc_socket. I thought
> > > >> rte_malloc_socket() could solve the problem too. And the
> > > >> appropriate parameter should be the socket_id that created the
> > > >> memory pool for DPDK initialization. Assuming that> the socket_id
> > > >> of the initially allocated memory = 1, first let the
> > > > eal_intr_thread
> > > >> determine if it is on the socket_id, then record this socket_id
> > > >> in the eal_intr_thread and pass it to the iavf_event_thread. But
> > > >> there seems no way to link this parameter to the
> > > >> iavf_dev_event_post()
> > > function. That is why rte_malloc_socket is not used.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > I was thinking socket id of device can be used, but that won't
> > > > help if the core that interrupt handler runs is in different socket.
> > > > And I also don't know if there is a way to get socket that
> > > > interrupt thread is on. @David may help perhaps.
> > > >
> > > > So question is why interrupt thread is not running on main lcore.
> > > >
> > >
> > > OK after some talk with David, what I am missing is
> 'rte_ctrl_thread_create()'
> > > does NOT run on main lcore, it can run on any core except data plane
> cores.
> > >
> > > Driver "iavf-event-thread" thread (iavf_dev_event_handle()) and
> > > interrupt thread (so driver interrupt callback
> > > iavf_dev_event_post()) can run on any core, making it hard to manage.
> > > And it seems it is not possible to control where interrupt thread to run.
> > >
> > > One option can be allocating hugepages for all sockets, but this
> > > requires user involvement, and can't happen transparently.
> > >
> > > Other option can be to control where "iavf-event-thread" run, like
> > > using 'rte_thread_create()' to create thread and provide attribute
> > > to run it on main lcore (rte_lcore_cpuset(rte_get_main_lcore()))?
> > >
> > > Can you please test above option?
> > >
> > >
> > The first option can solve this issue. but to borrow from your
> > previous saying, "in a dual socket system, if all used cores are in
> > socket 1 and the NIC is in socket 1, no memory is allocated for socket 0.
> This is to optimize memory consumption."
> > I think it's unreasonable to do so.
> >
> > About other option. In " rte_eal_intr_init" function, After the thread
> > is created, I set the thread affinity for eal-intr-thread, but it does not solve
> this issue.
>
> Jumping in this thread.
>
> I tried to play a bit with a E810 nic on a dual numa and I can't see anything
> wrong for now.
> Can you provide a simple and small reproducer of your issue?
>
> Thanks.
>
This is my environment:
Enter "lscpu" on the command line:
NUMA:
NUMA node(s): 2
NUMA node0 CPU(S) : 0-27,56-83
NUMA node1 CPU(S) : 28-55,84-111
List the steps to reproduce the issue:
1. create vf and blind to dpdk
echo 1 > /sys/bus/pci/devices/0000\:ca\:00.0/sriov_ numvfs
./usertools/dpdk-devbind. py -b vfio-pci 0000:ca:01.0
2. launch testpmd
./x86_ 64-native-linuxapp-clang/app/dpdk-testpmd -l 28-48 -n 4 -a 0000:ca:01.0
--file-prefix=dpdk_ 525342_ 20221104042659 -- -i --rxq=256 --txq=256
--total-num-mbufs=500000
Parameter Description:
"-l 28-48":The range of parameter values after "-l" must be on "NUMA node1 CPU(S)"
"0000:ca:01.0":inset on node1
> --
> David Marchand
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-20 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-11-17 6:57 Kaisen You
2022-11-18 8:22 ` Jiale, SongX
2022-12-07 9:07 ` You, KaisenX
2022-12-08 8:46 ` Wu, Jingjing
2022-12-08 15:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-12-13 7:52 ` You, KaisenX
2022-12-13 9:35 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-12-13 13:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-12-20 6:52 ` You, KaisenX
2022-12-20 9:33 ` David Marchand
2022-12-20 10:11 ` You, KaisenX [this message]
2022-12-20 10:33 ` David Marchand
2022-12-21 9:12 ` You, KaisenX
2022-12-21 10:50 ` David Marchand
2022-12-22 6:42 ` You, KaisenX
2022-12-27 6:06 ` You, KaisenX
2023-01-10 10:16 ` David Marchand
2023-01-13 6:24 ` You, KaisenX
2022-12-21 13:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-12-22 7:23 ` You, KaisenX
2022-12-22 12:06 ` Ferruh Yigit
2022-12-26 2:17 ` Zhang, Qi Z
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SJ0PR11MB67653AD1614F9249EA65A5FEE1EA9@SJ0PR11MB6765.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=kaisenx.you@intel.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=beilei.xing@intel.com \
--cc=bluca@debian.org \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=qiming.yang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=yidingx.zhou@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).