patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Dumitrescu, Cristian" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "Stable@dpdk.org" <Stable@dpdk.org>, Jun Yang <jun.yang@nxp.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples/ip_pipeline: fix to use sock id	instead of cpuid
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 11:27:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB27170D00627029F8B685753CEB150@SN6PR11MB2717.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191211052534.14600-2-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev <dev-bounces@dpdk.org> On Behalf Of Hemant Agrawal
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2019 5:26 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Dumitrescu, Cristian <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>; Stable@dpdk.org;
> Jun Yang <jun.yang@nxp.com>
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] examples/ip_pipeline: fix to use sock id
> instead of cpuid
> 
> From: Jun Yang <jun.yang@nxp.com>
> 
> rte_lcore_to_socket_id should be used to convert cpu ID to socket ID.
> 
> Fixes: 6bfe74f8c93e ("examples/ip_pipeline: add mempool object")
> Fixes: d75c371e9b46 ("examples/ip_pipeline: add pipeline object")
> Cc: Stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jun Yang <jun.yang@nxp.com>
> ---
>  examples/ip_pipeline/mempool.c  |  2 +-
>  examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline.c | 10 +++++-----
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/examples/ip_pipeline/mempool.c
> b/examples/ip_pipeline/mempool.c
> index f5d2a7d108..d7eea85f8f 100644
> --- a/examples/ip_pipeline/mempool.c
> +++ b/examples/ip_pipeline/mempool.c
> @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ mempool_create(const char *name, struct
> mempool_params *params)
>  		params->cache_size,
>  		0,
>  		params->buffer_size - sizeof(struct rte_mbuf),
> -		params->cpu_id);
> +		rte_lcore_to_socket_id(params->cpu_id));
> 
>  	if (m == NULL)
>  		return NULL;
> diff --git a/examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline.c
> b/examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline.c
> index b627310a0c..d8df62d785 100644
> --- a/examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline.c
> +++ b/examples/ip_pipeline/pipeline.c
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ pipeline_create(const char *name, struct
> pipeline_params *params)
> 
>  	msgq_req = rte_ring_create(msgq_name,
>  		PIPELINE_MSGQ_SIZE,
> -		params->cpu_id,
> +		rte_lcore_to_socket_id(params->cpu_id),
>  		RING_F_SP_ENQ | RING_F_SC_DEQ);
>  	if (msgq_req == NULL)
>  		return NULL;
> @@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ pipeline_create(const char *name, struct
> pipeline_params *params)
> 
>  	msgq_rsp = rte_ring_create(msgq_name,
>  		PIPELINE_MSGQ_SIZE,
> -		params->cpu_id,
> +		rte_lcore_to_socket_id(params->cpu_id),
>  		RING_F_SP_ENQ | RING_F_SC_DEQ);
>  	if (msgq_rsp == NULL) {
>  		rte_ring_free(msgq_req);
> @@ -111,7 +111,7 @@ pipeline_create(const char *name, struct
> pipeline_params *params)
>  	}
> 
>  	pp.name = name;
> -	pp.socket_id = (int) params->cpu_id;
> +	pp.socket_id = (int) rte_lcore_to_socket_id(params->cpu_id);
>  	pp.offset_port_id = params->offset_port_id;
> 
>  	p = rte_pipeline_create(&pp);
> @@ -332,7 +332,7 @@ pipeline_port_in_create(const char *pipeline_name,
> 
>  	if (ap) {
>  		action = rte_port_in_action_create(ap->ap,
> -			pipeline->cpu_id);
> +			rte_lcore_to_socket_id(pipeline->cpu_id));
>  		if (action == NULL)
>  			return -1;
> 
> @@ -1002,7 +1002,7 @@ pipeline_table_create(const char *pipeline_name,
> 
>  	if (ap) {
>  		action = rte_table_action_create(ap->ap,
> -			pipeline->cpu_id);
> +			rte_lcore_to_socket_id(pipeline->cpu_id));
>  		if (action == NULL)
>  			return -1;
> 
> --
> 2.17.1

NACK.

This is incorrect, probably a misunderstanding: the params->cpu_id is already the CPU socket ID (passed as parameter), and not the core ID. For core ID, we typically use variable names as core_id or lcore_id, and never cpu_id.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-02-14 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-11  5:25 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] examples/ip_pipeline: fix crypto queue config Hemant Agrawal
2019-12-11  5:25 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] examples/ip_pipeline: fix to use sock id instead of cpuid Hemant Agrawal
2020-02-14 11:27   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian [this message]
2020-02-14 15:18     ` [dpdk-stable] [EXT] RE: [dpdk-dev] " Jun Yang
2020-02-18 10:47       ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2020-02-19 14:17         ` Jun Yang
2020-02-14 10:52 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/ip_pipeline: fix crypto queue config Zhang, Roy Fan
2020-02-14 11:22 ` Dumitrescu, Cristian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB27170D00627029F8B685753CEB150@SN6PR11MB2717.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=Stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jun.yang@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).