From: "McDaniel, Timothy" <timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"jerinj@marvell.com" <jerinj@marvell.com>,
"jerinjacobk@gmail.com" <jerinjacobk@gmail.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 0/2] DLB2: cq_weight fixes
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2022 15:02:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <SN6PR11MB31036E9461934534BE8FCEA49E829@SN6PR11MB3103.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4621719.8FI41Ny9JD@thomas>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> Sent: Friday, July 8, 2022 9:26 AM
> To: McDaniel, Timothy <timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com>
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; jerinj@marvell.com; jerinjacobk@gmail.com;
> stable@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] DLB2: cq_weight fixes
>
> 06/07/2022 23:46, Timothy McDaniel:
> > This patch series contains the following:
> > - fix coverity issue 379234
> > - improve error reporting for cq_weight feature
> >
> > Changes since V1
> > - fixed a repeated word in the commit message of patch 1
> >
> > Timothy McDaniel (2):
> > event/dlb2: fix cq_weight array overflow
> > event/dlb2: improve cq_weight error messages
>
> Should we merge those patches in 22.07-rc4? No risk?
I see no risk in merging these changes. I retested with them, and one fixes a coverity issue.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-08 15:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20220706213141.2374006-1-timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com>
2022-07-06 21:31 ` [PATCH 1/2] event/dlb2: fix cq_weight array overflow Timothy McDaniel
2022-07-06 21:46 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] DLB2: cq_weight fixes Timothy McDaniel
2022-07-06 21:46 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] event/dlb2: fix cq_weight array overflow Timothy McDaniel
2022-07-06 21:46 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] event/dlb2: improve cq_weight error messages Timothy McDaniel
2022-07-08 14:26 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] DLB2: cq_weight fixes Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-08 15:02 ` McDaniel, Timothy [this message]
2022-07-11 20:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2022-07-11 20:33 ` McDaniel, Timothy
2022-07-06 21:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] event/dlb2: improve cq_weight error messages Timothy McDaniel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=SN6PR11MB31036E9461934534BE8FCEA49E829@SN6PR11MB3103.namprd11.prod.outlook.com \
--to=timothy.mcdaniel@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinjacobk@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).