patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / Atom feed
* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] cryptodev: fix invalid dev_id after a pmd close
@ 2019-08-07  8:39 Julien Meunier
  2019-10-03 12:49 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Akhil Goyal
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Julien Meunier @ 2019-08-07  8:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Pablo de Lara, Declan Doherty; +Cc: dev, stable

Each cryptodev are indexed with its dev_id in the global
rte_crypto_devices variable. nb_devs is incremented / decremented each
time a cryptodev is created / deleted. The goal of nb_devs is to prevent
the user to get an invalid dev_id.

Let's imagine DPDK has configured N cryptodevs. If the cryptodev=1 is
removed at runtime, the latest cryptodev N cannot be accessible, because
nb_devs=N-1.

In order to prevent this kind of behavior, let's remove the check with
nb_devs and iterate in all the rte_crypto_devices elements: if data is
not NULL, that means a valid cryptodev is available.

Fixes: d11b0f30df88 ("cryptodev: introduce API and framework for crypto devices")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Julien Meunier <julien.meunier@nokia.com>
---
 lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
index 43bc335..c8c7ffd 100644
--- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
@@ -49,9 +49,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *rte_cryptodevs = rte_crypto_devices;
 
 static struct rte_cryptodev_global cryptodev_globals = {
 		.devs			= rte_crypto_devices,
-		.data			= { NULL },
-		.nb_devs		= 0,
-		.max_devs		= RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS
+		.data			= { NULL }
 };
 
 /* spinlock for crypto device callbacks */
@@ -512,7 +510,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_named_dev(const char *name)
 	if (name == NULL)
 		return NULL;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
 		dev = &cryptodev_globals.devs[i];
 
 		if ((dev->attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) &&
@@ -523,12 +521,21 @@ rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_named_dev(const char *name)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static uint8_t
+rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(uint8_t dev_id)
+{
+	if (rte_crypto_devices[dev_id].data == NULL)
+		return 0;
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
 unsigned int
 rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(uint8_t dev_id)
 {
 	struct rte_cryptodev *dev = NULL;
 
-	if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs)
+	if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(dev_id))
 		return 0;
 
 	dev = rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_dev(dev_id);
@@ -547,12 +554,15 @@ rte_cryptodev_get_dev_id(const char *name)
 	if (name == NULL)
 		return -1;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.nb_devs; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
+		if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
+			continue;
 		if ((strcmp(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data->name, name)
 				== 0) &&
 				(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
 						RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED))
 			return i;
+	}
 
 	return -1;
 }
@@ -560,7 +570,13 @@ rte_cryptodev_get_dev_id(const char *name)
 uint8_t
 rte_cryptodev_count(void)
 {
-	return cryptodev_globals.nb_devs;
+	uint8_t i, dev_count = 0;
+
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++)
+		if (cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data != NULL)
+			dev_count++;
+
+	return dev_count;
 }
 
 uint8_t
@@ -568,7 +584,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_device_count_by_driver(uint8_t driver_id)
 {
 	uint8_t i, dev_count = 0;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++)
 		if (cryptodev_globals.devs[i].driver_id == driver_id &&
 			cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
 					RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED)
@@ -583,9 +599,10 @@ rte_cryptodev_devices_get(const char *driver_name, uint8_t *devices,
 {
 	uint8_t i, count = 0;
 	struct rte_cryptodev *devs = cryptodev_globals.devs;
-	uint8_t max_devs = cryptodev_globals.max_devs;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < max_devs && count < nb_devices;	i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS && count < nb_devices; i++) {
+		if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
+			continue;
 
 		if (devs[i].attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) {
 			int cmp;
@@ -736,8 +753,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_pmd_allocate(const char *name, int socket_id)
 		TAILQ_INIT(&(cryptodev->link_intr_cbs));
 
 		cryptodev->attached = RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED;
-
-		cryptodev_globals.nb_devs++;
 	}
 
 	return cryptodev;
@@ -766,7 +781,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_pmd_release_device(struct rte_cryptodev *cryptodev)
 		return ret;
 
 	cryptodev->attached = RTE_CRYPTODEV_DETACHED;
-	cryptodev_globals.nb_devs--;
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1099,7 +1113,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_info_get(uint8_t dev_id, struct rte_cryptodev_info *dev_info)
 {
 	struct rte_cryptodev *dev;
 
-	if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs) {
+	if (!rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(dev_id)) {
 		CDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid dev_id=%d", dev_id);
 		return;
 	}
-- 
2.10.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] cryptodev: fix invalid dev_id after a pmd close
  2019-08-07  8:39 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] cryptodev: fix invalid dev_id after a pmd close Julien Meunier
@ 2019-10-03 12:49 ` " Akhil Goyal
  2019-10-15 13:44   ` Akhil Goyal
  2019-10-15 16:50 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] cryptodev: fix check related to device id Julien Meunier
  2019-10-16 10:21 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Julien Meunier
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Akhil Goyal @ 2019-10-03 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Julien Meunier, Pablo de Lara, Declan Doherty; +Cc: dev, stable

Hi Julien

> 
> Each cryptodev are indexed with its dev_id in the global
> rte_crypto_devices variable. nb_devs is incremented / decremented each
> time a cryptodev is created / deleted. The goal of nb_devs is to prevent
> the user to get an invalid dev_id.
> 
> Let's imagine DPDK has configured N cryptodevs. If the cryptodev=1 is
> removed at runtime, the latest cryptodev N cannot be accessible, because
> nb_devs=N-1.
> 
> In order to prevent this kind of behavior, let's remove the check with
> nb_devs and iterate in all the rte_crypto_devices elements: if data is
> not NULL, that means a valid cryptodev is available.
> 
> Fixes: d11b0f30df88 ("cryptodev: introduce API and framework for crypto
> devices")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Meunier <julien.meunier@nokia.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> --
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> index 43bc335..c8c7ffd 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> @@ -49,9 +49,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *rte_cryptodevs = rte_crypto_devices;
> 
>  static struct rte_cryptodev_global cryptodev_globals = {
>  		.devs			= rte_crypto_devices,
> -		.data			= { NULL },
> -		.nb_devs		= 0,
> -		.max_devs		= RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS
> +		.data			= { NULL }
>  };
> 
>  /* spinlock for crypto device callbacks */
> @@ -512,7 +510,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_named_dev(const char *name)
>  	if (name == NULL)
>  		return NULL;
> 
> -	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
>  		dev = &cryptodev_globals.devs[i];
> 
>  		if ((dev->attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) &&
> @@ -523,12 +521,21 @@ rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_named_dev(const char
> *name)
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> 
> +static uint8_t
> +rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(uint8_t dev_id)
> +{
> +	if (rte_crypto_devices[dev_id].data == NULL)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return 1;
> +}
> +
>  unsigned int
>  rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(uint8_t dev_id)
>  {
>  	struct rte_cryptodev *dev = NULL;
> 
> -	if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs)
> +	if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(dev_id))
>  		return 0;
> 
>  	dev = rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_dev(dev_id);
> @@ -547,12 +554,15 @@ rte_cryptodev_get_dev_id(const char *name)
>  	if (name == NULL)
>  		return -1;
> 
> -	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.nb_devs; i++)
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
> +		if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
> +			continue;
>  		if ((strcmp(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data->name, name)
>  				== 0) &&
>  				(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
>  						RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED))
>  			return i;
> +	}
> 
>  	return -1;
>  }
> @@ -560,7 +570,13 @@ rte_cryptodev_get_dev_id(const char *name)
>  uint8_t
>  rte_cryptodev_count(void)
>  {
> -	return cryptodev_globals.nb_devs;
> +	uint8_t i, dev_count = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++)
> +		if (cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data != NULL)
> +			dev_count++;
> +
> +	return dev_count;
>  }

Why do you want to remove the nb_devs? We can have it updated (incremented/decremented)
While allocate/release of the device.
The point is, whenever somebody call rte_cryptodev_count() it will do a lookup of valid data
pointer.

> 
>  uint8_t
> @@ -568,7 +584,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_device_count_by_driver(uint8_t
> driver_id)
>  {
>  	uint8_t i, dev_count = 0;
> 
> -	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++)
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++)
>  		if (cryptodev_globals.devs[i].driver_id == driver_id &&
>  			cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
>  					RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED)
> @@ -583,9 +599,10 @@ rte_cryptodev_devices_get(const char *driver_name,
> uint8_t *devices,
>  {
>  	uint8_t i, count = 0;
>  	struct rte_cryptodev *devs = cryptodev_globals.devs;
> -	uint8_t max_devs = cryptodev_globals.max_devs;
> 
> -	for (i = 0; i < max_devs && count < nb_devices;	i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS && count < nb_devices; i++) {
> +		if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
> +			continue;
> 
>  		if (devs[i].attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) {
>  			int cmp;
> @@ -736,8 +753,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_pmd_allocate(const char *name, int
> socket_id)
>  		TAILQ_INIT(&(cryptodev->link_intr_cbs));
> 
>  		cryptodev->attached = RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED;
> -
> -		cryptodev_globals.nb_devs++;
>  	}
> 
>  	return cryptodev;
> @@ -766,7 +781,6 @@ rte_cryptodev_pmd_release_device(struct
> rte_cryptodev *cryptodev)
>  		return ret;
> 
>  	cryptodev->attached = RTE_CRYPTODEV_DETACHED;
> -	cryptodev_globals.nb_devs--;
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> @@ -1099,7 +1113,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_info_get(uint8_t dev_id, struct
> rte_cryptodev_info *dev_info)
>  {
>  	struct rte_cryptodev *dev;
> 
> -	if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs) {
> +	if (!rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(dev_id)) {
>  		CDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid dev_id=%d", dev_id);
>  		return;
>  	}
> --
> 2.10.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] cryptodev: fix invalid dev_id after a pmd close
  2019-10-03 12:49 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Akhil Goyal
@ 2019-10-15 13:44   ` Akhil Goyal
  2019-10-15 14:39     ` Meunier, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Akhil Goyal @ 2019-10-15 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Akhil Goyal, Julien Meunier, Pablo de Lara, Declan Doherty; +Cc: dev, stable


> 
> Hi Julien
> 
> >
> > Each cryptodev are indexed with its dev_id in the global
> > rte_crypto_devices variable. nb_devs is incremented / decremented each
> > time a cryptodev is created / deleted. The goal of nb_devs is to prevent
> > the user to get an invalid dev_id.
> >
> > Let's imagine DPDK has configured N cryptodevs. If the cryptodev=1 is
> > removed at runtime, the latest cryptodev N cannot be accessible, because
> > nb_devs=N-1.
> >
> > In order to prevent this kind of behavior, let's remove the check with
> > nb_devs and iterate in all the rte_crypto_devices elements: if data is
> > not NULL, that means a valid cryptodev is available.
> >
> > Fixes: d11b0f30df88 ("cryptodev: introduce API and framework for crypto
> > devices")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Julien Meunier <julien.meunier@nokia.com>
> > ---
// snip// 

> > @@ -560,7 +570,13 @@ rte_cryptodev_get_dev_id(const char *name)
> >  uint8_t
> >  rte_cryptodev_count(void)
> >  {
> > -	return cryptodev_globals.nb_devs;
> > +	uint8_t i, dev_count = 0;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++)
> > +		if (cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data != NULL)
> > +			dev_count++;
> > +
> > +	return dev_count;
> >  }
> 
> Why do you want to remove the nb_devs? We can have it updated
> (incremented/decremented)
> While allocate/release of the device.
> The point is, whenever somebody call rte_cryptodev_count() it will do a lookup
> of valid data
> pointer.

Could you please do the requested change. This patch need to be integrated by this week.

Thanks.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] cryptodev: fix invalid dev_id after a pmd close
  2019-10-15 13:44   ` Akhil Goyal
@ 2019-10-15 14:39     ` Meunier, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Meunier, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) @ 2019-10-15 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Akhil Goyal, Pablo de Lara, Declan Doherty; +Cc: dev, stable

Hi

On 15/10/2019 15:44, Akhil Goyal wrote:
> 
>>
>> Hi Julien
>>
>>>
>>> Each cryptodev are indexed with its dev_id in the global
>>> rte_crypto_devices variable. nb_devs is incremented / decremented each
>>> time a cryptodev is created / deleted. The goal of nb_devs is to prevent
>>> the user to get an invalid dev_id.
>>>
>>> Let's imagine DPDK has configured N cryptodevs. If the cryptodev=1 is
>>> removed at runtime, the latest cryptodev N cannot be accessible, because
>>> nb_devs=N-1.
>>>
>>> In order to prevent this kind of behavior, let's remove the check with
>>> nb_devs and iterate in all the rte_crypto_devices elements: if data is
>>> not NULL, that means a valid cryptodev is available.
>>>
>>> Fixes: d11b0f30df88 ("cryptodev: introduce API and framework for crypto
>>> devices")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Julien Meunier <julien.meunier@nokia.com>
>>> ---
> // snip//
> 
>>> @@ -560,7 +570,13 @@ rte_cryptodev_get_dev_id(const char *name)
>>>   uint8_t
>>>   rte_cryptodev_count(void)
>>>   {
>>> -	return cryptodev_globals.nb_devs;
>>> +	uint8_t i, dev_count = 0;
>>> +
>>> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++)
>>> +		if (cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data != NULL)
>>> +			dev_count++;
>>> +
>>> +	return dev_count;
>>>   }
>>
>> Why do you want to remove the nb_devs? We can have it updated
>> (incremented/decremented)
>> While allocate/release of the device.
>> The point is, whenever somebody call rte_cryptodev_count() it will do a lookup
>> of valid data
>> pointer.
> 
> Could you please do the requested change. This patch need to be integrated by this week.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
Sorry, I was busy on other tasks. I will propose a new patch today by 
keeping the nb_devs field.

Regards.

-- 
Julien Meunier

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] cryptodev: fix check related to device id
  2019-08-07  8:39 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] cryptodev: fix invalid dev_id after a pmd close Julien Meunier
  2019-10-03 12:49 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Akhil Goyal
@ 2019-10-15 16:50 ` Julien Meunier
  2019-10-16  7:02   ` Akhil Goyal
  2019-10-16 10:21 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Julien Meunier
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Julien Meunier @ 2019-10-15 16:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Declan Doherty; +Cc: dev, stable, akhil.goyal

Each cryptodev are indexed with dev_id in the global rte_crypto_devices
variable. nb_devs is incremented / decremented each time a cryptodev is
created / deleted. The goal of nb_devs was to prevent the user to get an
invalid dev_id.

Let's imagine DPDK has configured N cryptodevs. If the cryptodev=1 is
removed at runtime, the latest cryptodev N cannot be accessible, because
nb_devs=N-1 with the current implementaion.

In order to prevent this kind of behavior, let's remove the check with
nb_devs and iterate in all the rte_crypto_devices elements: if data is
not NULL, that means a valid cryptodev is available.

Also, remove max_devs field and use RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS in order to
unify the code.

Fixes: d11b0f30df88 ("cryptodev: introduce API and framework for crypto devices")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Julien Meunier <julien.meunier@nokia.com>
---
v2:
* Restore nb_devs
* Update headline (check-git-log.sh)
* Update commit log

 lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
index b16ef7b..933c38d 100644
--- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
@@ -50,8 +50,7 @@
 static struct rte_cryptodev_global cryptodev_globals = {
		.devs			= rte_crypto_devices,
 		.data			= { NULL },
-		.nb_devs		= 0,
-		.max_devs		= RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS
+		.nb_devs		= 0
 };
 
 /* spinlock for crypto device callbacks */
@@ -512,7 +511,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
 	if (name == NULL)
 		return NULL;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
 		dev = &cryptodev_globals.devs[i];
 
 		if ((dev->attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) &&
@@ -523,12 +522,21 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static uint8_t
+rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(uint8_t dev_id)
+{
+	if (rte_crypto_devices[dev_id].data == NULL)
+		return 0;
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
 unsigned int
 rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(uint8_t dev_id)
 {
 	struct rte_cryptodev *dev = NULL;
 
-	if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs)
+	if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(dev_id))
 		return 0;
 
 	dev = rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_dev(dev_id);
@@ -547,12 +555,15 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
 	if (name == NULL)
 		return -1;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.nb_devs; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
+		if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
+			continue;
 		if ((strcmp(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data->name, name)
 				== 0) &&
 				(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
 						RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED))
 			return i;
+	}
 
 	return -1;
 }
@@ -568,7 +579,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
 {
 	uint8_t i, dev_count = 0;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++)
 		if (cryptodev_globals.devs[i].driver_id == driver_id &&
 			cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
 					RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED)
@@ -583,9 +594,10 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
 {
 	uint8_t i, count = 0;
 	struct rte_cryptodev *devs = cryptodev_globals.devs;
-	uint8_t max_devs = cryptodev_globals.max_devs;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < max_devs && count < nb_devices;	i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS && count < nb_devices; i++) {
+		if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
+			continue;
 
 		if (devs[i].attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) {
 			int cmp;
@@ -1101,7 +1113,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
 {
 	struct rte_cryptodev *dev;
 
-	if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs) {
+	if (!rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(dev_id)) {
 		CDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid dev_id=%d", dev_id);
 		return;
 	}
-- 
1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] cryptodev: fix check related to device id
  2019-10-15 16:50 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] cryptodev: fix check related to device id Julien Meunier
@ 2019-10-16  7:02   ` Akhil Goyal
  2019-10-16  7:16     ` Meunier, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Akhil Goyal @ 2019-10-16  7:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Julien Meunier, Declan Doherty
  Cc: dev, stable, Anoob Joseph, Fiona Trahe, Ananyev, Konstantin

Hi Julien,

A couple of nits. Please see inline.

Apart from that
Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>

> 
> Each cryptodev are indexed with dev_id in the global rte_crypto_devices
> variable. nb_devs is incremented / decremented each time a cryptodev is
> created / deleted. The goal of nb_devs was to prevent the user to get an
> invalid dev_id.
> 
> Let's imagine DPDK has configured N cryptodevs. If the cryptodev=1 is
> removed at runtime, the latest cryptodev N cannot be accessible, because
> nb_devs=N-1 with the current implementaion.
> 
> In order to prevent this kind of behavior, let's remove the check with
> nb_devs and iterate in all the rte_crypto_devices elements: if data is
> not NULL, that means a valid cryptodev is available.
> 
> Also, remove max_devs field and use RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS in order to
> unify the code.
> 
> Fixes: d11b0f30df88 ("cryptodev: introduce API and framework for crypto
> devices")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Meunier <julien.meunier@nokia.com>
> ---
> v2:
> * Restore nb_devs
> * Update headline (check-git-log.sh)
> * Update commit log
> 
>  lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> index b16ef7b..933c38d 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
> @@ -50,8 +50,7 @@
>  static struct rte_cryptodev_global cryptodev_globals = {
> 		.devs			= rte_crypto_devices,
>  		.data			= { NULL },
> -		.nb_devs		= 0,
> -		.max_devs		= RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS
> +		.nb_devs		= 0
>  };

Max_devs field shall also be removed from struct rte_cryptodev_global in "lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_pmd.h"
> 
>  /* spinlock for crypto device callbacks */
> @@ -512,7 +511,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
>  	if (name == NULL)
>  		return NULL;
> 
> -	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
>  		dev = &cryptodev_globals.devs[i];
> 
>  		if ((dev->attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) &&
> @@ -523,12 +522,21 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
>  	return NULL;
>  }
> 
> +static uint8_t
> +rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(uint8_t dev_id)
> +{
> +	if (rte_crypto_devices[dev_id].data == NULL)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	return 1;
> +}

rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data should be a static inline function.

> +
>  unsigned int
>  rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(uint8_t dev_id)
>  {
>  	struct rte_cryptodev *dev = NULL;
> 
> -	if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs)
> +	if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(dev_id))
>  		return 0;
> 
>  	dev = rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_dev(dev_id);
> @@ -547,12 +555,15 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
>  	if (name == NULL)
>  		return -1;
> 
> -	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.nb_devs; i++)
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
> +		if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
> +			continue;
>  		if ((strcmp(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data->name, name)
>  				== 0) &&
>  				(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
>  						RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED))
>  			return i;
> +	}
> 
>  	return -1;
>  }
> @@ -568,7 +579,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
>  {
>  	uint8_t i, dev_count = 0;
> 
> -	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++)
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++)
>  		if (cryptodev_globals.devs[i].driver_id == driver_id &&
>  			cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
>  					RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED)
> @@ -583,9 +594,10 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
>  {
>  	uint8_t i, count = 0;
>  	struct rte_cryptodev *devs = cryptodev_globals.devs;
> -	uint8_t max_devs = cryptodev_globals.max_devs;
> 
> -	for (i = 0; i < max_devs && count < nb_devices;	i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS && count < nb_devices; i++) {
> +		if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
> +			continue;
> 
>  		if (devs[i].attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) {
>  			int cmp;
> @@ -1101,7 +1113,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
>  {
>  	struct rte_cryptodev *dev;
> 
> -	if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs) {
> +	if (!rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(dev_id)) {
>  		CDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid dev_id=%d", dev_id);
>  		return;
>  	}
> --
> 1.8.3.1


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] cryptodev: fix check related to device id
  2019-10-16  7:02   ` Akhil Goyal
@ 2019-10-16  7:16     ` Meunier, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Meunier, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay) @ 2019-10-16  7:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Akhil Goyal, Declan Doherty
  Cc: dev, stable, Anoob Joseph, Fiona Trahe, Ananyev, Konstantin

Hi,

Inline reply

On 16/10/2019 09:02, Akhil Goyal wrote:
> Hi Julien,
> 
> A couple of nits. Please see inline.
> 
> Apart from that
> Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>
> 
>>
>> Each cryptodev are indexed with dev_id in the global rte_crypto_devices
>> variable. nb_devs is incremented / decremented each time a cryptodev is
>> created / deleted. The goal of nb_devs was to prevent the user to get an
>> invalid dev_id.
>>
>> Let's imagine DPDK has configured N cryptodevs. If the cryptodev=1 is
>> removed at runtime, the latest cryptodev N cannot be accessible, because
>> nb_devs=N-1 with the current implementaion.
>>
>> In order to prevent this kind of behavior, let's remove the check with
>> nb_devs and iterate in all the rte_crypto_devices elements: if data is
>> not NULL, that means a valid cryptodev is available.
>>
>> Also, remove max_devs field and use RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS in order to
>> unify the code.
>>
>> Fixes: d11b0f30df88 ("cryptodev: introduce API and framework for crypto
>> devices")
>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Meunier <julien.meunier@nokia.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> * Restore nb_devs
>> * Update headline (check-git-log.sh)
>> * Update commit log
>>
>>   lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>   1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
>> b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
>> index b16ef7b..933c38d 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
>> @@ -50,8 +50,7 @@
>>   static struct rte_cryptodev_global cryptodev_globals = {
>> 		.devs			= rte_crypto_devices,
>>   		.data			= { NULL },
>> -		.nb_devs		= 0,
>> -		.max_devs		= RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS
>> +		.nb_devs		= 0
>>   };
> 
> Max_devs field shall also be removed from struct rte_cryptodev_global in "lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_pmd.h"

Oops, yes, I didn't clean-up all the code :) I will do that.


>>
>>   /* spinlock for crypto device callbacks */
>> @@ -512,7 +511,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
>>   	if (name == NULL)
>>   		return NULL;
>>
>> -	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++) {
>> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
>>   		dev = &cryptodev_globals.devs[i];
>>
>>   		if ((dev->attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) &&
>> @@ -523,12 +522,21 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
>>   	return NULL;
>>   }
>>
>> +static uint8_t
>> +rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(uint8_t dev_id)
>> +{
>> +	if (rte_crypto_devices[dev_id].data == NULL)
>> +		return 0;
>> +
>> +	return 1;
>> +}
> 
> rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data should be a static inline function.

OK.

> 
>> +
>>   unsigned int
>>   rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(uint8_t dev_id)
>>   {
>>   	struct rte_cryptodev *dev = NULL;
>>
>> -	if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs)
>> +	if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(dev_id))
>>   		return 0;
>>
>>   	dev = rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_dev(dev_id);
>> @@ -547,12 +555,15 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
>>   	if (name == NULL)
>>   		return -1;
>>
>> -	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.nb_devs; i++)
>> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
>> +		if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
>> +			continue;
>>   		if ((strcmp(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data->name, name)
>>   				== 0) &&
>>   				(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
>>   						RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED))
>>   			return i;
>> +	}
>>
>>   	return -1;
>>   }
>> @@ -568,7 +579,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
>>   {
>>   	uint8_t i, dev_count = 0;
>>
>> -	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++)
>> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++)
>>   		if (cryptodev_globals.devs[i].driver_id == driver_id &&
>>   			cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
>>   					RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED)
>> @@ -583,9 +594,10 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
>>   {
>>   	uint8_t i, count = 0;
>>   	struct rte_cryptodev *devs = cryptodev_globals.devs;
>> -	uint8_t max_devs = cryptodev_globals.max_devs;
>>
>> -	for (i = 0; i < max_devs && count < nb_devices;	i++) {
>> +	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS && count < nb_devices; i++) {
>> +		if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
>> +			continue;
>>
>>   		if (devs[i].attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) {
>>   			int cmp;
>> @@ -1101,7 +1113,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *
>>   {
>>   	struct rte_cryptodev *dev;
>>
>> -	if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs) {
>> +	if (!rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(dev_id)) {
>>   		CDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid dev_id=%d", dev_id);
>>   		return;
>>   	}
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
> 

Thanks,
-- 
Julien Meunier

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] cryptodev: fix check related to device id
  2019-08-07  8:39 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] cryptodev: fix invalid dev_id after a pmd close Julien Meunier
  2019-10-03 12:49 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Akhil Goyal
  2019-10-15 16:50 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] cryptodev: fix check related to device id Julien Meunier
@ 2019-10-16 10:21 ` " Julien Meunier
  2019-10-16 12:49   ` Akhil Goyal
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Julien Meunier @ 2019-10-16 10:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Declan Doherty; +Cc: dev, stable, akhil.goyal

Each cryptodev are indexed with dev_id in the global rte_crypto_devices
variable. nb_devs is incremented / decremented each time a cryptodev is
created / deleted. The goal of nb_devs was to prevent the user to get an
invalid dev_id.

Let's imagine DPDK has configured N cryptodevs. If the cryptodev=1 is
removed at runtime, the latest cryptodev N cannot be accessible, because
nb_devs=N-1 with the current implementaion.

In order to prevent this kind of behavior, let's remove the check with
nb_devs and iterate in all the rte_crypto_devices elements: if data is
not NULL, that means a valid cryptodev is available.

Also, remove max_devs field and use RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS in order to
unify the code.

Fixes: d11b0f30df88 ("cryptodev: introduce API and framework for crypto devices")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Julien Meunier <julien.meunier@nokia.com>
---
v3:
* Set rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data as inline
* Remove max_devs in rte_cryptodev_global

v2:
* Restore nb_devs
* Update headline (check-git-log.sh)
* Update commit log

 lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c     | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++---------
 lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_pmd.h |  1 -
 2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
index b16ef7b..89aa2ed 100644
--- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
+++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev.c
@@ -50,8 +50,7 @@ struct rte_cryptodev *rte_cryptodevs = rte_crypto_devices;
 static struct rte_cryptodev_global cryptodev_globals = {
 		.devs			= rte_crypto_devices,
 		.data			= { NULL },
-		.nb_devs		= 0,
-		.max_devs		= RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS
+		.nb_devs		= 0
 };
 
 /* spinlock for crypto device callbacks */
@@ -512,7 +511,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_named_dev(const char *name)
 	if (name == NULL)
 		return NULL;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
 		dev = &cryptodev_globals.devs[i];
 
 		if ((dev->attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) &&
@@ -523,12 +522,21 @@ rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_named_dev(const char *name)
 	return NULL;
 }
 
+static inline uint8_t
+rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(uint8_t dev_id)
+{
+	if (rte_crypto_devices[dev_id].data == NULL)
+		return 0;
+
+	return 1;
+}
+
 unsigned int
 rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(uint8_t dev_id)
 {
 	struct rte_cryptodev *dev = NULL;
 
-	if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs)
+	if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(dev_id))
 		return 0;
 
 	dev = rte_cryptodev_pmd_get_dev(dev_id);
@@ -547,12 +555,15 @@ rte_cryptodev_get_dev_id(const char *name)
 	if (name == NULL)
 		return -1;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.nb_devs; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++) {
+		if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
+			continue;
 		if ((strcmp(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].data->name, name)
 				== 0) &&
 				(cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
 						RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED))
 			return i;
+	}
 
 	return -1;
 }
@@ -568,7 +579,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_device_count_by_driver(uint8_t driver_id)
 {
 	uint8_t i, dev_count = 0;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < cryptodev_globals.max_devs; i++)
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS; i++)
 		if (cryptodev_globals.devs[i].driver_id == driver_id &&
 			cryptodev_globals.devs[i].attached ==
 					RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED)
@@ -583,9 +594,10 @@ rte_cryptodev_devices_get(const char *driver_name, uint8_t *devices,
 {
 	uint8_t i, count = 0;
 	struct rte_cryptodev *devs = cryptodev_globals.devs;
-	uint8_t max_devs = cryptodev_globals.max_devs;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < max_devs && count < nb_devices;	i++) {
+	for (i = 0; i < RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS && count < nb_devices; i++) {
+		if (!rte_cryptodev_is_valid_device_data(i))
+			continue;
 
 		if (devs[i].attached == RTE_CRYPTODEV_ATTACHED) {
 			int cmp;
@@ -1101,7 +1113,7 @@ rte_cryptodev_info_get(uint8_t dev_id, struct rte_cryptodev_info *dev_info)
 {
 	struct rte_cryptodev *dev;
 
-	if (dev_id >= cryptodev_globals.nb_devs) {
+	if (!rte_cryptodev_pmd_is_valid_dev(dev_id)) {
 		CDEV_LOG_ERR("Invalid dev_id=%d", dev_id);
 		return;
 	}
diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_pmd.h b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_pmd.h
index defe05e..fba14f2 100644
--- a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_pmd.h
+++ b/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_cryptodev_pmd.h
@@ -61,7 +61,6 @@ struct rte_cryptodev_global {
 	struct rte_cryptodev_data *data[RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS];
 	/**< Device private data */
 	uint8_t nb_devs;		/**< Number of devices found */
-	uint8_t max_devs;		/**< Max number of devices */
 };
 
 /* Cryptodev driver, containing the driver ID */
-- 
2.10.2


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] cryptodev: fix check related to device id
  2019-10-16 10:21 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Julien Meunier
@ 2019-10-16 12:49   ` Akhil Goyal
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Akhil Goyal @ 2019-10-16 12:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Julien Meunier, Declan Doherty; +Cc: dev, stable



> 
> Each cryptodev are indexed with dev_id in the global rte_crypto_devices
> variable. nb_devs is incremented / decremented each time a cryptodev is
> created / deleted. The goal of nb_devs was to prevent the user to get an
> invalid dev_id.
> 
> Let's imagine DPDK has configured N cryptodevs. If the cryptodev=1 is
> removed at runtime, the latest cryptodev N cannot be accessible, because
> nb_devs=N-1 with the current implementaion.
> 
> In order to prevent this kind of behavior, let's remove the check with
> nb_devs and iterate in all the rte_crypto_devices elements: if data is
> not NULL, that means a valid cryptodev is available.
> 
> Also, remove max_devs field and use RTE_CRYPTO_MAX_DEVS in order to
> unify the code.
> 
> Fixes: d11b0f30df88 ("cryptodev: introduce API and framework for crypto
> devices")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julien Meunier <julien.meunier@nokia.com>
Acked-by: Akhil Goyal <akhil.goyal@nxp.com>

Applied to dpdk-next-crypto

Thanks.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, back to index

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-08-07  8:39 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] cryptodev: fix invalid dev_id after a pmd close Julien Meunier
2019-10-03 12:49 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Akhil Goyal
2019-10-15 13:44   ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-15 14:39     ` Meunier, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
2019-10-15 16:50 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] cryptodev: fix check related to device id Julien Meunier
2019-10-16  7:02   ` Akhil Goyal
2019-10-16  7:16     ` Meunier, Julien (Nokia - FR/Paris-Saclay)
2019-10-16 10:21 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Julien Meunier
2019-10-16 12:49   ` Akhil Goyal

patches for DPDK stable branches

Archives are clonable:
	git clone --mirror http://inbox.dpdk.org/stable/0 stable/git/0.git

	# If you have public-inbox 1.1+ installed, you may
	# initialize and index your mirror using the following commands:
	public-inbox-init -V2 stable stable/ http://inbox.dpdk.org/stable \
		stable@dpdk.org
	public-inbox-index stable


Newsgroup available over NNTP:
	nntp://inbox.dpdk.org/inbox.dpdk.stable


AGPL code for this site: git clone https://public-inbox.org/ public-inbox