From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE00A0547 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 17:16:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5449411F9; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 17:16:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mga17.intel.com (mga17.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEAC4067A; Fri, 1 Oct 2021 17:16:24 +0200 (CEST) X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10124"; a="205618138" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,339,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="205618138" Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Oct 2021 08:15:53 -0700 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.85,339,1624345200"; d="scan'208";a="619206648" Received: from bricha3-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.252.10.40]) by fmsmga001-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Oct 2021 08:15:51 -0700 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2021 16:15:48 +0100 From: Bruce Richardson To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, bluca@debian.org Message-ID: References: <20210915173633.59057-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <2209110.ZU905HFkbt@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2209110.ZU905HFkbt@thomas> Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] doc/examples: fix build on FreeBSD X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Fri, Oct 01, 2021 at 05:03:11PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 15/09/2021 19:36, Bruce Richardson: > > On FreeBSD, "find" does not support the "printf" flag, so we need to > > use "gfind" from the "findutils" package. > > It is one more dependency. > Shouldn't we avoid it by rewritting the shell commands with loops? > Probably in the longer term, yes. If I get the chance, I'll try and rewrite this script, but let's keep this patch in the queue in case I don't get to in the 21.11 timeframe. /Bruce