From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0DCA0524 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:26:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959F8240634; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:26:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wm1-f50.google.com (mail-wm1-f50.google.com [209.85.128.50]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38AFB2405C1 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:26:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm1-f50.google.com with SMTP id 190so2966156wmz.0 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 04:26:29 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:mime-version; bh=voD1qlJvhnIeaZLnG404LiJzJllTPZT+o7BNWHqQnOA=; b=VXL1/mSI1IPAlbk7SeJf2ewSfH4PUUTo8qAJ2FrBRhsYLXlR4Exs3GXbBlKSV3/XEo nwVS/oPCMqLC0pxrBehB0O/XxePeUwd6rvko95+vj1f6+hWFScLPkMxsI4FFRbUupjBw GDuZN6IE/EbzSlmVpF2VggxqMH8b8ggJFWUxI0/c61gMeGLxBoW5f4ru8v8xSEUjZj9S Jkh+T2QWLlxFzpv21Kw/I4j3mEw8qf6LQEnwyRr3FjRWoAb7NEFpjgFRU8XxluzVC/iP VFlRbu42+vrabGhculPbrUfx2CW61GQ5O8DLEg4OtyZgm8hJCygGGq0duRziftL0tqba OGvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531/X7rZ+HKPrF+pcrb4HOqXUhUZNwy2yiEU+E4D+f6bU2eHsZEI z+7ONLAKs5di/LIdlxlPd9c= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVPjv9/tNzazRixpZ1+iUHWBDxYY/0r6EdLKaN+1NGyCzCx95RKN2fl/mhbaM+e13Iw2SXfw== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:48c4:: with SMTP id v187mr7158696wma.145.1612441588990; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 04:26:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([88.98.246.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d16sm7761240wrr.59.2021.02.04.04.26.27 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 04:26:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: From: Luca Boccassi To: Christian Ehrhardt , dpdk stable Cc: Kevin Traynor Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:26:27 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20210204120903.2515011-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> References: <20210204120903.2515011-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/3] 3-request-backport: add hint to QUEUED_REPO X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 13:09 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > When we ask for backports the code that we get sent might match latest > dpdk.org:dpdk-stable.git but not our WIP branch. >=20 > To mimimize any errors that arise out of that hint at the QUEUED_REPO > int he call for backport-help. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt > --- > 3-request-backport | 13 +++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) >=20 > diff --git a/3-request-backport b/3-request-backport > index 5749e26..d123531 100755 > --- a/3-request-backport > +++ b/3-request-backport > @@ -61,7 +61,20 @@ Can authors check your patches in the following list a= nd either: > =20 > Please do either of the above by $(date --date=3D"+7 days" "+%D"). > =20 > +EOF > + > +if [ "$QUEUED_REPO" !=3D "none" ]; then > + cat << EOF > +You can find the a temporary work-in-progress branch of the coming $stab= le_release > +release at: > + ${QUEUED_REPO} > +It is recommended to backport on top of that to minimize further conflic= ts or > +misunderstandings. > + > +EOF > +fi > =20 > +cat << EOF > Some notes on $(stable_or_lts) backports: > =20 > A backport should contain a reference to the DPDK main branch commit Acked-by: Luca Boccassi --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi