From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D588CA2EDB for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:50:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FEA444C7; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:50:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-wr1-f67.google.com (mail-wr1-f67.google.com [209.85.221.67]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB8B44C7 for ; Tue, 1 Oct 2019 10:50:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wr1-f67.google.com with SMTP id i1so14427793wro.4 for ; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 01:50:11 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:mime-version; bh=naN08/rH867uR0qNfn5+zYuronnObCWGRulDNW7Q/cw=; b=E585nctY4JuVmdL4itxrXgLNRQ1Ml/9Suit8i8ewJn9tFHwPD8kfcIR170lBRbgkV1 6FdcREcIz6/wBt77QN1/xBo9bs6RLT7RlDdC36RwBmRKnHoiVtCBowIrq6VLcihhXPXA hTkUscOA54tSYpxjQRjGKNwxq8Ms+Yx1uheJteGpzYZjczCqguYBCIC5mpJvZINlUIka sfKRb1m5scL7HEKRYLK8X/QI/u3/v1Dt5E1kl537Ro17O/JSJCr4aVqbDXJ0PwCnj1EK UYuPacHzH/jH3Kj+KvlXye+ZxIue5GZxM+RKTYZI2EilD4CcvxXWZ/sA09h5pV3aSdkG uDNg== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUTlq+FYt9XRwLlTmvcUOUUGSw49Q6WSA2k69CO/liRQcCZkbfV f0ngxI2KEB1E/j9MHlt9voc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxdrGp25nRmRuYMYOZQXme2Z5Mpo5pDvVOsu0I3InGzh4NA9e5TCzyTQuvs4dTF3ibCqOkCXg== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4c45:: with SMTP id n5mr17919507wrt.100.1569919811160; Tue, 01 Oct 2019 01:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2a01:4b00:f419:6f00:7a8e:ed70:5c52:ea3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r12sm15658533wrq.88.2019.10.01.01.50.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Oct 2019 01:50:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: From: Luca Boccassi To: Ciara Power , stable@dpdk.org Cc: joyce.kong@arm.com Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2019 09:50:09 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20190927101453.61228-1-ciara.power@intel.com> References: <20190927101453.61228-1-ciara.power@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 17.11.7-rc1] test/rwlock: fix missing include X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Fri, 2019-09-27 at 11:14 +0100, Ciara Power wrote: > Using PRIu64 in print statements caused errors, > due to the inttypes header file not being included > at the top of the file. This is now included. >=20 > Fixes: 29e08d740ffc ("test/rwlock: benchmark on all available cores") > Cc:=20 > joyce.kong@arm.com >=20 > Cc:=20 > stable@dpdk.org >=20 >=20 > Reported-by: WenhuiX Zhu < > wenhuix.zhu@intel.com > > > Signed-off-by: Ciara Power < > ciara.power@intel.com > > > --- > test/test/test_rwlock.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >=20 > diff --git a/test/test/test_rwlock.c b/test/test/test_rwlock.c > index 1f327fecf..06788d288 100644 > --- a/test/test/test_rwlock.c > +++ b/test/test/test_rwlock.c > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > =20 > #include > #include Hello Ciara, Thanks for sending the patch, but a similar one was merged a few days earlier: http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/stable/2019-September/017514.html --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi