From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE323A0524 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:26:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D855E240634; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:26:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-f47.google.com (mail-wr1-f47.google.com [209.85.221.47]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086E9240634 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:26:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f47.google.com with SMTP id p15so3246497wrq.8 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 04:26:52 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:mime-version; bh=jllWUCVmL6tYlpYJgnwIhCUVxW0/6u1m5zIdqTh7P0k=; b=fEe3SxGEUzsMgHWhJpEcQPZxRl/UcrBOd3/baO67U2JcnFaPcVAB3Pkp2l7xGnfpDk +GHHYE82YWNbhjnDSfWOtaGhLd8rlfMjOEEyuHVyX6UjPN8UYZ7wZC8y9nhRwrFp6nZD aEmjJh5tTiZXe9DX4d8VpeKAC3pVdWhomHAmYG2+WBpFJ9xhzqPoDrTXmjEuru3XTC7S xNdEkDLzmXDSBmJAq/gvlWfzYwmmONYvbI85b5GG9yipkJtZkyrXbxYjw1DSQ52z48Aw jcGflUFIJTqXE3gUDh9BZw+6e/UrDZVCXcDt9SERvWDdHjYW27YiJ67/jd6PwonEm6nL 65fQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531HiATCTO7hmlQyRSHNVwTipFul3wvunPZfSg+zTFjkxpCDcVOi 3mpWLR3kc4RRlR0zssC1Ddw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyyhKsZhKRL2V/u7wiN3/9F+wfp2PJ7B88pg4m1cY243alDs/w3diALDzbs+B572xyS9is3bA== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:440a:: with SMTP id z10mr9207456wrq.266.1612441611850; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 04:26:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([88.98.246.218]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y11sm7666902wrh.16.2021.02.04.04.26.51 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 04:26:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: From: Luca Boccassi To: Christian Ehrhardt , dpdk stable Cc: Kevin Traynor Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:26:50 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20210204120903.2515011-2-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> References: <20210204120903.2515011-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> <20210204120903.2515011-2-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/3] README: add hint on git send-email vs flooding protection X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 13:09 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt > --- > README | 11 +++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) >=20 > diff --git a/README b/README > index 3e4978a..771b97e 100644 > --- a/README > +++ b/README > @@ -87,6 +87,17 @@ changes. To aid this, a personal repo like github can = be used to store the queue > patches and it can be referenced in the email. If it is available it is = set it > in lib.sh with QUEUED_REPO. > =20 > +Note: > +Once generally configured git send-email can submit those via: > + $ git send-email $release/$date/mail/*.patch > +But some email providers will apply limits and a DPDK LTS maintainers of= ten send > +>100 mails at once. To avoid being blocked in between a submission by fl= ood > +protection that is active for some common providers smtp services consid= er > +adding the following to your gitconfig: > + [sendemail] > + smtpBatchSize =3D 5 > + smtpReloginDelay =3D 10 > + > 3-request-backport > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Acked-by: Luca Boccassi --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi