From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 134A7A0524 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:27:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C17C240634; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:27:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-f53.google.com (mail-wr1-f53.google.com [209.85.221.53]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942B6240634 for ; Thu, 4 Feb 2021 13:27:16 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f53.google.com with SMTP id u14so3301067wri.3 for ; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 04:27:16 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to :references:content-transfer-encoding:user-agent:mime-version; bh=+LvvKPzeg43VMmyQ2zrnRsBRAbFEp7WCHDuQoINtTKE=; b=SkebFWqbyvvE9aDQYflab+7aHXylhDJlaLyUqHnaLMDS36fUpS09WRHKlYZhZ66bsT HrQCmq/xuSVBUsOvVUnw09ml0weEX6E+bYkdSwvAE+SbMvZ2NJ4SI4E1povL8Fwf3s9G j+kK6Ov2ngC6jLEDbfWuEM1/a8JusDHm6SqKmpd47ARUHcHCtFZ0Jhs3SC9luY4ISi/n ih7c4sWyWhdZeMtWGHHIFJnEy0ux9/4O02l8IH1h4cfA1EVvCnDhLXJxD9XfDL9jzFYE OaM+ej9RUKyB9p72Vl6++/GJygxizbjFYxpGn3sTTI6+eeSMbIAelEMdTH74YfeB6l+k QywA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533HOO1QIK37xRlS5lzP4ZmurgZIKzc9ozgCBmO9KBvTjEsWQbCT qZsJJH8PSIgT6sv5Fwjxmb4= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxadbZwEYb2Ra2ZNX0cTkJ9zRZfapNAZNziFk1oGW5+eW6Dn/VZXASJVSf3QElX1AkDYwo9bw== X-Received: by 2002:adf:80c3:: with SMTP id 61mr9229299wrl.100.1612441636427; Thu, 04 Feb 2021 04:27:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost ([2a01:4b00:f419:6f00:7a8e:ed70:5c52:ea3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w2sm6462637wmg.27.2021.02.04.04.27.15 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 04 Feb 2021 04:27:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: From: Luca Boccassi To: Christian Ehrhardt , dpdk stable Cc: Kevin Traynor Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 12:27:15 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20210204120903.2515011-3-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> References: <20210204120903.2515011-1-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> <20210204120903.2515011-3-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.30.5-1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 3/3] README: add hint on chaining multiple series submissions X-BeenThere: stable@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: patches for DPDK stable branches List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: stable-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "stable" On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 13:09 +0100, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Signed-off-by: Christian Ehrhardt > --- > README | 9 ++++++++- > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >=20 > diff --git a/README b/README > index 771b97e..6489379 100644 > --- a/README > +++ b/README > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ changes. To aid this, a personal repo like github can b= e used to store the queue > patches and it can be referenced in the email. If it is available it is = set it > in lib.sh with QUEUED_REPO. > =20 > -Note: > +Note - flood protection: > Once generally configured git send-email can submit those via: > $ git send-email $release/$date/mail/*.patch > But some email providers will apply limits and a DPDK LTS maintainers of= ten send > @@ -98,6 +98,13 @@ adding the following to your gitconfig: > smtpBatchSize =3D 5 > smtpReloginDelay =3D 10 > =20 > +Note - chain patch series submissions: > +Often one is working on the commits collected from lastrelease->rc1, to = later > +work again on e.g. rc1->rc2. To thread/chain these submissions right > +git send-email will ask for: > + Message-ID to be used as In-Reply-To for the first email (if any)? > +Here enter the Message-ID of the last patch of your formerly submitted s= eries. > + > 3-request-backport > =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Acked-by: Luca Boccassi --=20 Kind regards, Luca Boccassi