From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] kni: fix kernel deadlock when using mlx devices
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 18:33:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <da21a634-2a1a-7371-4233-97ee80da8248@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200505171454.00274f10@hermes.lan>
On 5/6/2020 1:14 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Mar 2020 16:17:57 +0100
> Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
>
>> 17/01/2020 17:43, Ferruh Yigit:
>>> On 12/22/2019 5:55 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>>> This fixes a deadlock when using KNI with bifurcated drivers.
>>>> Bringing kni device up always times out when using Mellanox
>>>> devices.
>>>>
>>>> The kernel KNI driver sends message to userspace to complete
>>>> the request. For the case of bifurcated driver, this may involve
>>>> an additional request to kernel to change state. This request
>>>> would deadlock because KNI was holding the RTNL mutex.
>>>>
>>>> This was a bad design which goes back to the original code.
>>>> A workaround is for KNI driver to drop RTNL while waiting.
>>>> To prevent the device from disappearing while the operation
>>>> is in progress, it needs to hold reference to network device
>>>> while waiting.
>>>>
>>>> As an added benefit, an useless error check can also be removed.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 3fc5ca2f6352 ("kni: initial import")
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> This patch cause a hang on my server, not sure what exactly was the problem but
>>> kernel log was continuously printing "Cannot send to req_q". Will dig more.
>>
>> Ferruh, did you have a chance to check what is hanging?
>> Stephen, is there any news on your side?
>>
>>
>
> It did not hang when I tested it. The bug report is still open
>
Sorry for the delay, since I am working remotely I was worried about loosing the
connection to my server, finally I did create a virtual environment to test again.
I confirm the hang observed %100 when two different process updates the kni
interface, like two different process sets the mtu. Without this patch this
works fine.
I understand the motivation of the patch, but with change there is a possibility
to hang the server, which we can't allow, need to find another way. Can updating
mlx interface wait KNI interface operation to complete?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-07-27 17:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-22 17:55 [dpdk-stable] " Stephen Hemminger
2020-01-17 16:43 ` Ferruh Yigit
2020-03-18 15:17 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon
2020-05-06 0:14 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-27 17:33 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2020-07-27 17:52 ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-07-28 8:56 ` Igor Ryzhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=da21a634-2a1a-7371-4233-97ee80da8248@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).