patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: "Tan, Jianfeng" <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>,
	"Patil, Harish" <Harish.Patil@cavium.com>,
	Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>,
	"Thotton, Shijith" <Shijith.Thotton@cavium.com>,
	Gregory Etelson <gregory@weka.io>,
	George Prekas <george.prekas@epfl.ch>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>,
	Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>,
	"Glynn, Michael J" <michael.j.glynn@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] igb_uio: revert open and release operations
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2017 09:32:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <efabcaad-b0e9-e360-22b5-953b0bc20032@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1f37e107-eb01-3a23-04a5-ba4c6e60d63d@intel.com>

On 10/20/2017 8:26 AM, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> Hi Ferruh & Harish,
> 
> 
> On 10/20/2017 9:15 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On 10/19/2017 3:43 PM, Patil, Harish wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Harish Patil <Harish.Patil@cavium.com>
>>> Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 at 9:50 PM
>>> To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>, Ferruh Yigit
>>> <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
>>> Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>,
>>> Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>, "Thotton, Shijith"
>>> <Shijith.Thotton@cavium.com>, Gregory Etelson <gregory@weka.io>, George
>>> Prekas <george.prekas@epfl.ch>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb_uio: revert open and release operations
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
>>>> Date: Tuesday, October 17, 2017 at 1:33 PM
>>>> To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, Harish Patil
>>>> <Harish.Patil@cavium.com>
>>>> Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>,
>>>> Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>, "Thotton, Shijith"
>>>> <Shijith.Thotton@cavium.com>, Gregory Etelson <gregory@weka.io>, George
>>>> Prekas <george.prekas@epfl.ch>, "stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] igb_uio: revert open and release operations
>>>>
>>>>> 17/10/2017 22:14, Ferruh Yigit:
>>>>>> There were bug reports about terminated application may leave device in
>>>>>> undesired state:
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-November/049745.html
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-November/050932.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And a proposal to fix:
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-December/051844.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Later another proposal triggered the discussion:
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-May/066317.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Finally a fix patch pushed into v17.08:
>>>>>> Commit: b58eedfc7dd5 ("igb_uio: issue FLR during open and release of
>>>>>> device file")
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Later a regression report sent related to the pushed patch:
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-September/075236.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> And a fix for regression integrated into v17.11-rc1:
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/079166.html
>>>>>> Commit: 5f6ff30dc507 ("igb_uio: fix interrupt enablement after FLR in
>>>>>> VM")
>>>>>> Commit: 6b9ed026a870 ("igb_uio: fix build with kernel <= 3.17")
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Even after the fix qede PMD reported to be broken:
>>>>>> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-October/079359.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So this patch reverts original fix and related commits. The related
>>>>>> igb_uio code part turns back to v17.05 base.
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> It would be nice to solve this issue in LTS release, but being close to
>>>>>> the release and the error report without details makes it hard to work
>>>>>> more on this issue.
>>>>> With this revert, we are back to the original issue.
>>>>> We must really try the proposed solution.
>>>>> Harish, please describe your issue and think how it could be fixed.
>>>>> Jingjing made it work for i40e.
>>>>> I know it is less effort to request a simple revert.
>>>>> Please let's try to fix it once for all.
>>>> Hi Ferruh/Thomas,
>>>> I’m discussing it internally, so please hold on committing this patch till
>>>> I revert back to you.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>> [Harish]
>>>> 1) With the introduction of:
>>>> Commit: b58eedfc7dd5 ("igb_uio: issue FLR during open and release of
>>>> device file”)
>>>     We saw failures with qede PF & SR-IOV VF initialization in PCI passthru
>>> mode.
>>>
>>>> PF PCI passthru mode initialization failure was resolved by:
>>>> “Commit: 5f6ff30dc507 ("igb_uio: fix interrupt enablement after FLR in
>>>> VM")
>> Thank you for the update.
>>
>>>> SR-IOV VF PCI passthru mode initialization issue is that PCI FLR and
>>>> related device cleanup is not completed by the time VF driver starts
>>>> loading. It results in the mbox command failure sent over the HW channel
>>>> between VF and PF.
>> This seems same reason why i40e added a check and wait loop.
>>
>>>> Even though pci_reset_function() waits for the stipulated amount of time
>>>> per standards, VF FLR takes longer than that and pci_reset_function() &
>>>> igb_uio_open() call returns before FLR completes and VF PMD driver tries
>>>> to load before FLR completes leading to VF PMD initialization failure.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We can work around this problem by adding driver delay/retry logic since
>>>> there is no deterministic way of detecting FLR completion. But this is
>>>> going to increase the driver load time.
>>>>
>>>> 2) With the above patch ("igb_uio: issue FLR during open and release of
>>>> device file), FLR is going to be issued unconditionally on all devices
>>>> during igb_uio_open. We think it’s an over kill. FLR is required only for
>>>> previous abnormal app termination. We already handle the abnormal app
>>>> termination by doing necessary cleanup in the driver during load. This
>>>> cleanup is more efficient as it is done only when required. So we feel
>>>> that the drivers/devices needing such cleanup (the two cases listed
>>>> below)  should do it conditionally when required rather than
>>>> igb_uio_open() unconditionally performing FLR all the time.
>>>>
>>>> e.g.,
>>>     - cdb166963cae ("net/liquidio: add API for VF FLR”)
>> Both 1) and 2) related to the pci_reset during open().
>> But the main functionality we are looking for is the pci_reset in release().
>> So we can remove reset during open() [1].
>>
>> Will disabling pci_reset in open() [2] solve your problems?
>>
>> Jingjing, Jianfeng,
>> What do you think?
> 
> If [2] can work for all drivers, I agree with this option.

OK, I will send this as a patch to make it easy to test and discuss.

> 
> Thanks,
> Jianfeng
> 
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> Perhaps will need to revert or partially revert liquidio patch after this.
>>
>> [2]
>> disable line "pci_reset_function(dev);" in the igbuio_pci_open()
>> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk/tree/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.c#n339
>>
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-20 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-10-17 20:14 Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-17 20:33 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-18  4:50   ` Patil, Harish
2017-10-19 22:43     ` Patil, Harish
2017-10-20  1:15       ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-20 15:26         ` Tan, Jianfeng
2017-10-20 16:32           ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2017-10-20 16:55             ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] igb_uio: remove device reset in open Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-20 16:57               ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-20 19:01                 ` Gregory Etelson
2017-10-20 22:18                 ` Patil, Harish
2017-10-23 12:28                 ` Shijith Thotton
2017-10-23 16:36                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-23 19:03                     ` Shijith Thotton
2017-10-24  2:45                   ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-10-25 23:43                 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Mody, Rasesh
2017-10-26  9:28                   ` Tan, Jianfeng
2017-10-27  0:49                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-01  6:58                       ` Mody, Rasesh
2017-11-01 14:12                         ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-11-02  8:03                           ` Mody, Rasesh
2017-11-02  8:55                             ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-02 17:34                               ` Mody, Rasesh
2017-11-02 18:09                                 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-02 18:45                                   ` Mody, Rasesh
2017-11-03  0:31                                     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-11-03 19:18                                       ` Mody, Rasesh
2017-10-24 21:38               ` [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-18  0:14 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] igb_uio: revert open and release operations Wu, Jingjing
2017-10-18  6:27 ` Shijith Thotton
2017-10-18 20:47   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-24 21:32 ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=efabcaad-b0e9-e360-22b5-953b0bc20032@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=Harish.Patil@cavium.com \
    --cc=Shijith.Thotton@cavium.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=george.prekas@epfl.ch \
    --cc=gregory@weka.io \
    --cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
    --cc=jingjing.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=michael.j.glynn@intel.com \
    --cc=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).