patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com>
To: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>,
	David Hunt <david.hunt@intel.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	hkalra@marvell.com, Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>,
	Honnappa Nagarahalli <honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>, dpdk stable <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/distributor: fix deadlock issue for aarch64
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2019 16:08:15 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f7t1rvn0zm8.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8yyt7EyPV_SKLmdFrXgqwJh=J-cLZ0GoRnoEBzh_Nnj7A@mail.gmail.com> (David Marchand's message of "Tue, 8 Oct 2019 21:46:37 +0200")

David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com> writes:

> On Tue, Oct 8, 2019 at 7:06 PM Aaron Conole <aconole@redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com> writes:
>>
>> > Distributor and worker threads rely on data structs in cache line
>> > for synchronization. The shared data structs were not protected.
>> > This caused deadlock issue on weaker memory ordering platforms as
>> > aarch64.
>> > Fix this issue by adding memory barriers to ensure synchronization
>> > among cores.
>> >
>> > Bugzilla ID: 342
>> > Fixes: 775003ad2f96 ("distributor: add new burst-capable library")
>> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
>> > Reviewed-by: Gavin Hu <gavin.hu@arm.com>
>> > ---
>>
>> I see a failure in the distributor_autotest (on one of the builds):
>>
>> 64/82 DPDK:fast-tests / distributor_autotest FAIL 0.37 s (exit
>> status 255 or signal 127 SIGinvalid)
>>
>> --- command ---
>>
>> DPDK_TEST='distributor_autotest'
>> /home/travis/build/ovsrobot/dpdk/build/app/test/dpdk-test -l 0-1
>> --file-prefix=distributor_autotest
>>
>> --- stdout ---
>>
>> EAL: Probing VFIO support...
>>
>> APP: HPET is not enabled, using TSC as default timer
>>
>> RTE>>distributor_autotest
>>
>> === Basic distributor sanity tests ===
>>
>> Worker 0 handled 32 packets
>>
>> Sanity test with all zero hashes done.
>>
>> Worker 0 handled 32 packets
>>
>> Sanity test with non-zero hashes done
>>
>> === testing big burst (single) ===
>>
>> Sanity test of returned packets done
>>
>> === Sanity test with mbuf alloc/free (single) ===
>>
>> Sanity test with mbuf alloc/free passed
>>
>> Too few cores to run worker shutdown test
>>
>> === Basic distributor sanity tests ===
>>
>> Worker 0 handled 32 packets
>>
>> Sanity test with all zero hashes done.
>>
>> Worker 0 handled 32 packets
>>
>> Sanity test with non-zero hashes done
>>
>> === testing big burst (burst) ===
>>
>> Sanity test of returned packets done
>>
>> === Sanity test with mbuf alloc/free (burst) ===
>>
>> Line 326: Packet count is incorrect, 1048568, expected 1048576
>>
>> Test Failed
>>
>> RTE>>
>>
>> --- stderr ---
>>
>> EAL: Detected 2 lcore(s)
>>
>> EAL: Detected 1 NUMA nodes
>>
>> EAL: Multi-process socket /var/run/dpdk/distributor_autotest/mp_socket
>>
>> EAL: Selected IOVA mode 'PA'
>>
>> EAL: No available hugepages reported in hugepages-1048576kB
>>
>> -------
>>
>> Not sure how to help debug further.  I'll re-start the job to see if
>> it 'clears' up - but I guess there may be a delicate synchronization
>> somewhere that needs to be accounted.
>
> Idem, and with the same loop I used before, it can be caught quickly.
>
> # time (log=/tmp/$$.log; while true; do echo distributor_autotest
> |taskset -c 0-1 ./build-gcc-static/app/test/dpdk-test --log-level *:8
> -l 0-1 >$log 2>&1; grep -q 'Test OK' $log || break; done; cat $log; rm
> -f $log)

Probably good to document it, yes.  It seems to be a good technique for
reproducing failures.

> [snip]
>
> RTE>>distributor_autotest
> EAL: Trying to obtain current memory policy.
> EAL: Setting policy MPOL_PREFERRED for socket 0
> EAL: Restoring previous memory policy: 0
> EAL: request: mp_malloc_sync
> EAL: Heap on socket 0 was expanded by 2MB
> EAL: Trying to obtain current memory policy.
> EAL: Setting policy MPOL_PREFERRED for socket 0
> EAL: Restoring previous memory policy: 0
> EAL: alloc_pages_on_heap(): couldn't allocate physically contiguous space
> EAL: Trying to obtain current memory policy.
> EAL: Setting policy MPOL_PREFERRED for socket 0
> EAL: Restoring previous memory policy: 0
> EAL: request: mp_malloc_sync
> EAL: Heap on socket 0 was expanded by 8MB
> === Basic distributor sanity tests ===
> Worker 0 handled 32 packets
> Sanity test with all zero hashes done.
> Worker 0 handled 32 packets
> Sanity test with non-zero hashes done
> === testing big burst (single) ===
> Sanity test of returned packets done
>
> === Sanity test with mbuf alloc/free (single) ===
> Sanity test with mbuf alloc/free passed
>
> Too few cores to run worker shutdown test
> === Basic distributor sanity tests ===
> Worker 0 handled 32 packets
> Sanity test with all zero hashes done.
> Worker 0 handled 32 packets
> Sanity test with non-zero hashes done
> === testing big burst (burst) ===
> Sanity test of returned packets done
>
> === Sanity test with mbuf alloc/free (burst) ===
> Line 326: Packet count is incorrect, 1048568, expected 1048576
> Test Failed
> RTE>>
> real    0m36.668s
> user    1m7.293s
> sys    0m1.560s
>
> Could be worth running this loop on all tests? (not talking about the
> CI, it would be a manual effort to catch lurking issues).

  reply	other threads:[~2019-10-08 20:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-08  9:55 [dpdk-stable] " Ruifeng Wang
2019-10-08 12:53 ` Hunt, David
2019-10-08 17:05 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Aaron Conole
2019-10-08 19:46   ` David Marchand
2019-10-08 20:08     ` Aaron Conole [this message]
2019-10-09  5:52     ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-17 11:42       ` [dpdk-stable] [EXT] " Harman Kalra
2019-10-17 13:48         ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
     [not found] ` <20191012024352.23545-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
2019-10-12  2:43   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/2] " Ruifeng Wang
2019-10-13  2:31     ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-10-14 10:00       ` Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)
2019-10-12  2:43   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] test/distributor: fix false unit test failure Ruifeng Wang
     [not found] ` <20191015092826.13002-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
2019-10-15  9:28   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/2] lib/distributor: fix deadlock issue for aarch64 Ruifeng Wang
2019-10-25  8:13     ` Hunt, David
2019-10-15  9:28   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 2/2] test/distributor: fix false unit test failure Ruifeng Wang
2019-10-25  8:13     ` Hunt, David

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=f7t1rvn0zm8.fsf@dhcp-25.97.bos.redhat.com \
    --to=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gavin.hu@arm.com \
    --cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).