From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org, Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: fix shallow copy of flow API RAW item
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 11:44:33 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9b8b3fe-292c-a5da-37e1-92454ae6b557@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180521082401.GO6497@6wind.com>
On 5/21/2018 9:24 AM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
> On Sat, May 19, 2018 at 04:25:15PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>> 18/05/2018 19:06, Ferruh Yigit:
>>> On 5/16/2018 4:41 PM, Adrien Mazarguil wrote:
>>>> Like original commit mentioned below, this fix synchronizes flow rule copy
>>>> function with testpmd's own implementation following "app/testpmd: fix copy
>>>> of raw flow item (revisited)".
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: d0ad8648b1c5 ("ethdev: fix shallow copy of flow API RSS action")
>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>> Cc: Qi Zhang <qi.z.zhang@intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
>>>
>>> Hi Thomas,
>>>
>>> What do you suggest about this one?
>>> Scope is limited to rte_flow but still many features are now relies on rte_flow,
>>> what is your comment on getting this in rc5?
>>
>> We need to know exactly what is broken.
>> If nothing serious, it can wait 18.08.
>>
>> Adrien, please can you describe the use case, the issue and the impact?
>
> A prior patch [1] (applied as "app/testpmd: fix copy of raw flow item"),
> addresses a crash in testpmd's flow copy function.
>
> The first patch of the present series [2] addresses remaining issues with
> its behavior which is, in fact, what caused the original issue.
>
> While both patches focus on testpmd, rte_flow also exposes its own public
> copy function with the exact same code that breaks when encountering a RAW
> pattern item. Primary users for this function are bonding and failsafe
> PMDs.
>
> This patch therefore addresses both [1] and [2] at once for rte_flow_copy().
Hi Adrien,
What is the effect of _not_ getting this patch, just trying to understand if
this is something to get for this release or postpone to next one.
Thanks,
ferruh
>
> [1] "app/testpmd: fix invalid memory access"
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-May/100364.html
>
> [2] "app/testpmd: fix copy of raw flow item (revisited)"
> http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2018-May/101994.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-21 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 15:41 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/2] app/testpmd: fix copy of raw flow item (revisited) Adrien Mazarguil
2018-05-16 15:41 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 2/2] ethdev: fix shallow copy of flow API RAW item Adrien Mazarguil
2018-05-18 17:06 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-19 14:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-21 8:24 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2018-05-21 10:44 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2018-05-21 11:18 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Adrien Mazarguil
2018-05-17 14:44 ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] app/testpmd: fix copy of raw flow item (revisited) Iremonger, Bernard
2018-05-21 11:44 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 " Adrien Mazarguil
2018-05-21 11:44 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 2/2] ethdev: fix shallow copy of flow API RAW item Adrien Mazarguil
2018-05-21 12:44 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 1/2] app/testpmd: fix copy of raw flow item (revisited) Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f9b8b3fe-292c-a5da-37e1-92454ae6b557@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=qi.z.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).