[dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw44053[v3] hash table: add an iterator over conflicting entries

automatic DPDK test reports
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed

From: sys_stv@intel.com
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw44053[v3] hash table: add an iterator over conflicting entries
Date: 30 Aug 2018 09:02:23 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0590c7$2i98cc@orsmga001.jf.intel.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8309 bytes --]

Test-Label: Intel-compilation
Test-Status: FAILURE
http://dpdk.org/patch/44053

_apply issues_

Submitter: Qiaobin Fu <qiaobinf@bu.edu>
Date: 2018-08-30 15:56:05
DPDK git baseline:
	Repo:dpdk-master, CommitID: 3605968c2fa783674624562a7dfab256eb9044ea
	Repo:dpdk-next-eventdev, CommitID: 76b9d9de5c7d747c381027156aac07735cb1bc0c
	Repo:dpdk-next-net, CommitID: 650534d9ab8fa95a877747d773c5248ddca91d87
	Repo:dpdk-next-crypto, CommitID: 7ee92e597554dd7cde8a47faad7d98091a260135
	Repo:dpdk-next-virtio, CommitID: 385ba3e1096528bf1cc3afd2d66773330610ccad

*Repo: dpdk-master
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c...
error: while searching for:
	return __builtin_popcountl(*hit_mask);
}

int32_t
rte_hash_iterate(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **key, void **data, uint32_t *next)
--
	(*next)++;

	return position - 1;
}

error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:1120
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c: patch does not apply
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h...
Hunk #2 succeeded at 66 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 450 (offset 44 lines).
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map...
error: while searching for:
	rte_hash_get_key_with_position;

} DPDK_2.2;

error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map:45
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map: patch does not apply
Checking patch test/test/test_hash.c...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1170 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1180 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1194 (offset 12 lines).
Checking patch test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c...
error: while searching for:

	const void *next_key;
	void *next_data;
	uint32_t iter = 0;

--

	snprintf(name, 32, "test%u", calledCount++);
	hash_params.name = name;

	handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params);
	RETURN_IF_ERROR(handle == NULL, "hash creation failed");

	tbl_multiwriter_test_params.h = handle;
	tbl_multiwriter_test_params.nb_tsx_insertion =
		nb_total_tsx_insertion / rte_lcore_count();

error: patch failed: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c:112
error: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c: patch does not apply
*Repo: dpdk-next-eventdev
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c...
error: while searching for:
	return __builtin_popcountl(*hit_mask);
}

int32_t
rte_hash_iterate(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **key, void **data, uint32_t *next)
--
	(*next)++;

	return position - 1;
}

error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:1120
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c: patch does not apply
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h...
Hunk #2 succeeded at 66 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 450 (offset 44 lines).
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map...
error: while searching for:
	rte_hash_get_key_with_position;

} DPDK_2.2;

error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map:45
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map: patch does not apply
Checking patch test/test/test_hash.c...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1170 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1180 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1194 (offset 12 lines).
Checking patch test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c...
error: while searching for:

	const void *next_key;
	void *next_data;
	uint32_t iter = 0;

--

	snprintf(name, 32, "test%u", calledCount++);
	hash_params.name = name;

	handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params);
	RETURN_IF_ERROR(handle == NULL, "hash creation failed");

	tbl_multiwriter_test_params.h = handle;
	tbl_multiwriter_test_params.nb_tsx_insertion =
		nb_total_tsx_insertion / rte_lcore_count();

error: patch failed: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c:112
error: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c: patch does not apply
*Repo: dpdk-next-net
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c...
error: while searching for:
	return __builtin_popcountl(*hit_mask);
}

int32_t
rte_hash_iterate(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **key, void **data, uint32_t *next)
--
	(*next)++;

	return position - 1;
}

error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:1120
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c: patch does not apply
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h...
Hunk #2 succeeded at 66 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 450 (offset 44 lines).
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map...
error: while searching for:
	rte_hash_get_key_with_position;

} DPDK_2.2;

error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map:45
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map: patch does not apply
Checking patch test/test/test_hash.c...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1170 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1180 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1194 (offset 12 lines).
Checking patch test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c...
error: while searching for:

	const void *next_key;
	void *next_data;
	uint32_t iter = 0;

--

	snprintf(name, 32, "test%u", calledCount++);
	hash_params.name = name;

	handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params);
	RETURN_IF_ERROR(handle == NULL, "hash creation failed");

	tbl_multiwriter_test_params.h = handle;
	tbl_multiwriter_test_params.nb_tsx_insertion =
		nb_total_tsx_insertion / rte_lcore_count();

error: patch failed: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c:112
error: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c: patch does not apply
*Repo: dpdk-next-crypto
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c...
error: while searching for:
	return __builtin_popcountl(*hit_mask);
}

int32_t
rte_hash_iterate(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **key, void **data, uint32_t *next)
--
	(*next)++;

	return position - 1;
}

error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:1120
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c: patch does not apply
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h...
Hunk #2 succeeded at 66 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 450 (offset 44 lines).
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map...
error: while searching for:
	rte_hash_get_key_with_position;

} DPDK_2.2;

error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map:45
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map: patch does not apply
Checking patch test/test/test_hash.c...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1170 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1180 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1194 (offset 12 lines).
Checking patch test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c...
error: while searching for:

	const void *next_key;
	void *next_data;
	uint32_t iter = 0;

--

	snprintf(name, 32, "test%u", calledCount++);
	hash_params.name = name;

	handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params);
	RETURN_IF_ERROR(handle == NULL, "hash creation failed");

	tbl_multiwriter_test_params.h = handle;
	tbl_multiwriter_test_params.nb_tsx_insertion =
		nb_total_tsx_insertion / rte_lcore_count();

error: patch failed: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c:112
error: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c: patch does not apply
*Repo: dpdk-next-virtio
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c...
error: while searching for:
	return __builtin_popcountl(*hit_mask);
}

int32_t
rte_hash_iterate(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **key, void **data, uint32_t *next)
--
	(*next)++;

	return position - 1;
}

error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:1120
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c: patch does not apply
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h...
Hunk #2 succeeded at 66 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 450 (offset 44 lines).
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map...
error: while searching for:
	rte_hash_get_key_with_position;

} DPDK_2.2;

error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map:45
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map: patch does not apply
Checking patch test/test/test_hash.c...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1170 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1180 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1194 (offset 12 lines).
Checking patch test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c...
error: while searching for:

	const void *next_key;
	void *next_data;
	uint32_t iter = 0;

--

	snprintf(name, 32, "test%u", calledCount++);
	hash_params.name = name;

	handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params);
	RETURN_IF_ERROR(handle == NULL, "hash creation failed");

	tbl_multiwriter_test_params.h = handle;
	tbl_multiwriter_test_params.nb_tsx_insertion =
		nb_total_tsx_insertion / rte_lcore_count();

error: patch failed: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c:112
error: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c: patch does not apply

DPDK STV team

                 reply	other threads:[~2018-08-30 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='0590c7$2i98cc@orsmga001.jf.intel.com' \
    --to=sys_stv@intel.com \
    --cc=test-report@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).