* [dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw44053[v3] hash table: add an iterator over conflicting entries
@ 2018-08-30 16:02 sys_stv
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: sys_stv @ 2018-08-30 16:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: test-report
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 8309 bytes --]
Test-Label: Intel-compilation
Test-Status: FAILURE
http://dpdk.org/patch/44053
_apply issues_
Submitter: Qiaobin Fu <qiaobinf@bu.edu>
Date: 2018-08-30 15:56:05
DPDK git baseline:
Repo:dpdk-master, CommitID: 3605968c2fa783674624562a7dfab256eb9044ea
Repo:dpdk-next-eventdev, CommitID: 76b9d9de5c7d747c381027156aac07735cb1bc0c
Repo:dpdk-next-net, CommitID: 650534d9ab8fa95a877747d773c5248ddca91d87
Repo:dpdk-next-crypto, CommitID: 7ee92e597554dd7cde8a47faad7d98091a260135
Repo:dpdk-next-virtio, CommitID: 385ba3e1096528bf1cc3afd2d66773330610ccad
*Repo: dpdk-master
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c...
error: while searching for:
return __builtin_popcountl(*hit_mask);
}
int32_t
rte_hash_iterate(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **key, void **data, uint32_t *next)
--
(*next)++;
return position - 1;
}
error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:1120
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c: patch does not apply
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h...
Hunk #2 succeeded at 66 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 450 (offset 44 lines).
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map...
error: while searching for:
rte_hash_get_key_with_position;
} DPDK_2.2;
error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map:45
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map: patch does not apply
Checking patch test/test/test_hash.c...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1170 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1180 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1194 (offset 12 lines).
Checking patch test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c...
error: while searching for:
const void *next_key;
void *next_data;
uint32_t iter = 0;
--
snprintf(name, 32, "test%u", calledCount++);
hash_params.name = name;
handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params);
RETURN_IF_ERROR(handle == NULL, "hash creation failed");
tbl_multiwriter_test_params.h = handle;
tbl_multiwriter_test_params.nb_tsx_insertion =
nb_total_tsx_insertion / rte_lcore_count();
error: patch failed: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c:112
error: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c: patch does not apply
*Repo: dpdk-next-eventdev
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c...
error: while searching for:
return __builtin_popcountl(*hit_mask);
}
int32_t
rte_hash_iterate(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **key, void **data, uint32_t *next)
--
(*next)++;
return position - 1;
}
error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:1120
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c: patch does not apply
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h...
Hunk #2 succeeded at 66 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 450 (offset 44 lines).
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map...
error: while searching for:
rte_hash_get_key_with_position;
} DPDK_2.2;
error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map:45
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map: patch does not apply
Checking patch test/test/test_hash.c...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1170 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1180 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1194 (offset 12 lines).
Checking patch test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c...
error: while searching for:
const void *next_key;
void *next_data;
uint32_t iter = 0;
--
snprintf(name, 32, "test%u", calledCount++);
hash_params.name = name;
handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params);
RETURN_IF_ERROR(handle == NULL, "hash creation failed");
tbl_multiwriter_test_params.h = handle;
tbl_multiwriter_test_params.nb_tsx_insertion =
nb_total_tsx_insertion / rte_lcore_count();
error: patch failed: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c:112
error: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c: patch does not apply
*Repo: dpdk-next-net
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c...
error: while searching for:
return __builtin_popcountl(*hit_mask);
}
int32_t
rte_hash_iterate(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **key, void **data, uint32_t *next)
--
(*next)++;
return position - 1;
}
error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:1120
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c: patch does not apply
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h...
Hunk #2 succeeded at 66 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 450 (offset 44 lines).
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map...
error: while searching for:
rte_hash_get_key_with_position;
} DPDK_2.2;
error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map:45
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map: patch does not apply
Checking patch test/test/test_hash.c...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1170 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1180 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1194 (offset 12 lines).
Checking patch test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c...
error: while searching for:
const void *next_key;
void *next_data;
uint32_t iter = 0;
--
snprintf(name, 32, "test%u", calledCount++);
hash_params.name = name;
handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params);
RETURN_IF_ERROR(handle == NULL, "hash creation failed");
tbl_multiwriter_test_params.h = handle;
tbl_multiwriter_test_params.nb_tsx_insertion =
nb_total_tsx_insertion / rte_lcore_count();
error: patch failed: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c:112
error: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c: patch does not apply
*Repo: dpdk-next-crypto
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c...
error: while searching for:
return __builtin_popcountl(*hit_mask);
}
int32_t
rte_hash_iterate(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **key, void **data, uint32_t *next)
--
(*next)++;
return position - 1;
}
error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:1120
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c: patch does not apply
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h...
Hunk #2 succeeded at 66 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 450 (offset 44 lines).
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map...
error: while searching for:
rte_hash_get_key_with_position;
} DPDK_2.2;
error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map:45
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map: patch does not apply
Checking patch test/test/test_hash.c...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1170 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1180 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1194 (offset 12 lines).
Checking patch test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c...
error: while searching for:
const void *next_key;
void *next_data;
uint32_t iter = 0;
--
snprintf(name, 32, "test%u", calledCount++);
hash_params.name = name;
handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params);
RETURN_IF_ERROR(handle == NULL, "hash creation failed");
tbl_multiwriter_test_params.h = handle;
tbl_multiwriter_test_params.nb_tsx_insertion =
nb_total_tsx_insertion / rte_lcore_count();
error: patch failed: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c:112
error: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c: patch does not apply
*Repo: dpdk-next-virtio
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c...
error: while searching for:
return __builtin_popcountl(*hit_mask);
}
int32_t
rte_hash_iterate(const struct rte_hash *h, const void **key, void **data, uint32_t *next)
--
(*next)++;
return position - 1;
}
error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c:1120
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_cuckoo_hash.c: patch does not apply
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash.h...
Hunk #2 succeeded at 66 (offset 3 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 450 (offset 44 lines).
Checking patch lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map...
error: while searching for:
rte_hash_get_key_with_position;
} DPDK_2.2;
error: patch failed: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map:45
error: lib/librte_hash/rte_hash_version.map: patch does not apply
Checking patch test/test/test_hash.c...
Hunk #1 succeeded at 1170 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 1180 (offset 12 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 1194 (offset 12 lines).
Checking patch test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c...
error: while searching for:
const void *next_key;
void *next_data;
uint32_t iter = 0;
--
snprintf(name, 32, "test%u", calledCount++);
hash_params.name = name;
handle = rte_hash_create(&hash_params);
RETURN_IF_ERROR(handle == NULL, "hash creation failed");
tbl_multiwriter_test_params.h = handle;
tbl_multiwriter_test_params.nb_tsx_insertion =
nb_total_tsx_insertion / rte_lcore_count();
error: patch failed: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c:112
error: test/test/test_hash_multiwriter.c: patch does not apply
DPDK STV team
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2018-08-30 16:02 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2018-08-30 16:02 [dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw44053[v3] hash table: add an iterator over conflicting entries sys_stv
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).