From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com (mx1.redhat.com [209.132.183.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205E61B3B8 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 05:46:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAB09C058CB7 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 04:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.20]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C91BA5DAA0 for ; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 04:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail23.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail23.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.28]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08121809545; Tue, 8 Jan 2019 04:46:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2019 23:46:36 -0500 (EST) From: Sitong Liu To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: ktraynor@redhat.com Message-ID: <1255303826.67114763.1546922796418.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <577547393.65866144.1546851061368.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.72.12.202, 10.4.195.4] Thread-Topic: DPDK 18.08 testing - PASS Thread-Index: cxwY+hU5ML0y6cDneoK7LVZbIGg67Q== X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.16 (mx1.redhat.com [10.5.110.32]); Tue, 08 Jan 2019 04:46:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 09 Jan 2019 17:57:09 +0100 Subject: [dpdk-test-report] DPDK 18.08 testing - PASS X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2019 04:46:41 -0000 Hi all, We did a test for DPDK 18.08, no regression bugs were found. Testing scenarios: (1)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size) PASS (2)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size) PASS (3)Guest with device assignment(VF) throughput testing PASS (4)PVP(host testpmd as vswitch) vhost-user 1Q throughput testing PASS (5)PVP(host testpmd as vswitch) vhost-user 2Q throughput testing PASS (6)PVP(host testpmd as vswitch) vhost-user 2Q & cross numa node throughput testing PASS (7)vhost-user reconnect with dpdk-client, qemu-server: ovs reconnect PASS (8)Guest with vhost-user hot plug throughput testing PASS (9)PVP(host testpmd as vswitch)vhost-user 1Q live migration testing PASS (10)Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user single queue live migration testing PASS (11)Guest with ovs+dpdk+vhost-user 2Q live migration testing PASS Testing NICs: X540-AT2(ixgbe). DPDK: http://dpdk.org/git/dpdk-stable commit 35a7f767600712d073e469d873362d03dc1962e4 Author: Kevin Traynor Date: Wed Jan 2 18:00:18 2019 +0000 Revert "raw/skeleton: fix memory leak on test failure" This reverts commit 8d739a452b4a33d41be4a41d7781e303c425d112. As per email from Shreyansh: -- > Shreyansh Jain (2): > bus/fslmc: fix physical addressing check > raw/skeleton: fix memory leak on test failure <==== this Please don't apply the 'raw/skeleton: fix memory leak on test failure' patch. There is problem with this as reported in another patch [1]. I will push a fix out (which would actually be reverting this patch) [1] https://patches.dpdk.org/patch/48635/ -- Fixes: 8d739a452b4a ("raw/skeleton: fix memory leak on test failure") Cc: Shreyansh Jain Signed-off-by: Kevin Traynor If you have any concern about the result, please let me know, thanks. Best regards, Sitong Liu Red Hat.