From: sys_stv@intel.com
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Cc: rasland@mellanox.com
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |FAILURE| pw29367 [PATCH v3 3/3] net/mlx5: add Rx HW timestamp
Date: 29 Sep 2017 00:59:24 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1a8a4b$13onkc9@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5655 bytes --]
Test-Label: Intel-compilation
Test-Status: FAILURE
http://dpdk.org/patch/29367
_Compilation issues_
Submitter: Raslan Darawsheh <rasland@mellanox.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 19:48:21 +0300
DPDK git baseline: Repo:dpdk-next-net, Branch:master, CommitID:b4fd9dcfcec56db1caa127cd03362500f9d5bd6b
Patch29365-29367 --> compile error
Build Summary: 21 Builds Done, 17 Successful, 4 Failures
Test environment and configuration as below:
OS: RHEL7.2_64
Kernel Version:3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
GCC Version:gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4)
Clang Version:3.4.2
i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
OS: UB1610_64
Kernel Version:4.8.0-22-generic
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
GCC Version:gcc (Ubuntu 6.2.0-5ubuntu12) 6.2.0 20161005
Clang Version:NA
x86_64-native-linuxapp-icc
OS: RHEL7.3_64
Kernel Version:3.10.0-514.16.1.el7.x86_64
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
GCC Version:gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-11)
Clang Version:NA
x86_64-native-linuxapp-icc
OS: FC25_64
Kernel Version:4.8.6-300.fc25.x86_64
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz
GCC Version:gcc (GCC) 6.3.1 20161221 (Red Hat 6.3.1-1)
Clang Version:NA
x86_64-native-linuxapp-icc
OS: FreeBSD10.3_64
Kernel Version:10.3-RELEASE
CPU info: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v4 @ 2.20GHz (2194.97-MHz K8-class CPU)
GCC Version:gcc (FreeBSD Ports Collection) 4.8.5
Clang Version:3.4.1
x86_64-native-bsdapp-clang
x86_64-native-bsdapp-gcc
OS: CentOS7_64
Kernel Version:3.10.0-514.10.2.el7.x86_64
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
GCC Version:gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-4)
Clang Version:3.4.2
i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
OS: FC24_64
Kernel Version:4.9.13-100.fc24.x86_64
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
GCC Version:gcc (GCC) 6.2.1 20160916 (Red Hat 6.2.1-2)
Clang Version:3.8.0
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-debug
i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
OS: UB1604_64
Kernel Version:4.4.0-78-generic
CPU info:Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2699 v3 @ 2.30GHz
GCC Version:gcc (Ubuntu 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 5.4.0 20160609
Clang Version:3.8.0
i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
x86_64-native-linuxapp-clang
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc-shared
x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
Failed Build #1:
OS: RHEL7.2_64
Target: i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test-pmd/rxonly.c: In function ‘pkt_burst_receive’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test-pmd/rxonly.c:162:4: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
printf(" - timestamp %lu ", mb->timestamp);
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Failed Build #2:
OS: CentOS7_64
Target: i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test-pmd/rxonly.c: In function ‘pkt_burst_receive’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test-pmd/rxonly.c:162:4: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘uint64_t’ [-Werror=format=]
printf(" - timestamp %lu ", mb->timestamp);
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
Failed Build #3:
OS: FC24_64
Target: i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test-pmd/rxonly.c: In function ‘pkt_burst_receive’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test-pmd/rxonly.c:162:27: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf(" - timestamp %lu ", mb->timestamp);
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:138: recipe for target 'rxonly.o' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:63: recipe for target 'test-pmd' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkbuild.mk:76: recipe for target 'app' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:128: recipe for target 'all' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkinstall.mk:85: recipe for target 'pre_install' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:107: recipe for target 'install' failed
Failed Build #4:
OS: UB1604_64
Target: i686-native-linuxapp-gcc
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test-pmd/rxonly.c: In function ‘pkt_burst_receive’:
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/app/test-pmd/rxonly.c:162:11: error: format ‘%lu’ expects argument of type ‘long unsigned int’, but argument 2 has type ‘uint64_t {aka long long unsigned int}’ [-Werror=format=]
printf(" - timestamp %lu ", mb->timestamp);
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/internal/rte.compile-pre.mk:138: recipe for target 'rxonly.o' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.subdir.mk:63: recipe for target 'test-pmd' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkbuild.mk:76: recipe for target 'app' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:128: recipe for target 'all' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkinstall.mk:85: recipe for target 'pre_install' failed
/home/patchWorkOrg/compilation/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:107: recipe for target 'install' failed
DPDK STV team
reply other threads:[~2017-09-29 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='1a8a4b$13onkc9@fmsmga001.fm.intel.com' \
--to=sys_stv@intel.com \
--cc=rasland@mellanox.com \
--cc=test-report@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).