From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 75D665583; Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:14:43 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1478524474-7154-1-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com> References: <1478524474-7154-1-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Reshma Pattan Message-Id: <20161107131443.75D665583@dpdk.org> Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 14:14:43 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| [PATCH v4] latencystats: added new library for latency stats X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2016 13:14:43 -0000 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/16966 _coding style issues_ WARNING:BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE: Block comments should align the * on each line #551: FILE: lib/librte_latencystats/rte_latencystats.c:185: + /** + *The jitter is calculated as statistical mean of interpacket WARNING:BLOCK_COMMENT_STYLE: Block comments should align the * on each line #570: FILE: lib/librte_latencystats/rte_latencystats.c:204: + /** + *The average latency is measured using exponential moving total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 769 lines checked