From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 6F98410C1E; Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:53 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <4dd8a5b7ddac21b2c453fcb566614d0965c442d7.1482314020.git.nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> References: <4dd8a5b7ddac21b2c453fcb566614d0965c442d7.1482314020.git.nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Nelio Laranjeiro Message-Id: <20161221100153.6F98410C1E@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 11:01:53 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw18353 [PATCH v2 3/4] net/mlx5: add rte_flow rule creation X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 10:01:53 -0000 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/18353 _coding style issues_ WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'struct priv *' should also have an identifier name #90: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h:287: +int priv_flow_apply(struct priv *); WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'struct priv *' should also have an identifier name #91: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h:288: +void priv_flow_remove(struct priv *); total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 852 lines checked