From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 9CC1CD142; Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:27:18 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1490683952-24919-7-git-send-email-rasesh.mody@cavium.com> References: <1490683952-24919-7-git-send-email-rasesh.mody@cavium.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: "Mody, Rasesh" Message-Id: <20170328122718.9CC1CD142@dpdk.org> Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 14:27:18 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw22500 [PATCH v4 06/62] net/qede: upgrade the FW to 8.18.9.0 X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2017 12:27:18 -0000 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/22500 _coding style issues_ CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'pq_size' - possible side-effects? #1533: FILE: drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:33: +#define QM_PQ_MEM_4KB(pq_size) (pq_size ? DIV_ROUND_UP((pq_size + 1) * \ + QM_PQ_ELEMENT_SIZE, 0x1000) : 0) CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'pq_size' - possible side-effects? #1535: FILE: drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:35: +#define QM_PQ_SIZE_256B(pq_size) (pq_size ? DIV_ROUND_UP(pq_size, 0x100) - 1 : \ + 0) CHECK:CAMELCASE: Avoid CamelCase: #3392: FILE: drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_init_fw_funcs.c:1600: + ramLine.lo = 0; total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 3 checks, 4604 lines checked