From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 387D87CDA; Wed, 24 May 2017 15:44:49 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: References: To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: =?utf-8?q?N=C3=A9lio_Laranjeiro?= Message-Id: <20170524134449.387D87CDA@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 15:44:49 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw24487 [PATCH] net/mlx5: implement isolated mode from flow API X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 May 2017 13:44:49 -0000 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/24487 _coding style issues_ WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'struct rte_eth_dev *' should also have an identifier name #48: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h:315: +int mlx5_flow_isolate(struct rte_eth_dev *, int, struct rte_flow_error *); WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'int' should also have an identifier name #48: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h:315: +int mlx5_flow_isolate(struct rte_eth_dev *, int, struct rte_flow_error *); WARNING:FUNCTION_ARGUMENTS: function definition argument 'struct rte_flow_error *' should also have an identifier name #48: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h:315: +int mlx5_flow_isolate(struct rte_eth_dev *, int, struct rte_flow_error *); total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 0 checks, 75 lines checked