From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Cc: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw25597 [PATCH 20/22] cryptodev: add AEAD parameters in crypto operation
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 17:49:07 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170621154907.E54097CF5@dpdk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170621074731.45013-20-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/25597
_coding style issues_
WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'an union' may be misspelled - perhaps 'a union'?
#16:
This structure is within an union with the cipher
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#264: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:607:
+ /**< Starting point for cipher processing, specified
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#265: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:608:
+ * as number of bytes from start of data in the source
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#266: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:609:
+ * buffer. The result of the cipher operation will be
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#267: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:610:
+ * written back into the output buffer starting at
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#277: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:620:
+ /**< The message length, in bytes, of the source buffer
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#279: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:622:
+ * computed. This must be a multiple of the block size
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#280: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:623:
+ * if a block cipher is being used. This is also the
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#284: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:627:
+ * In the case of CCM @ref RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_AES_CCM,
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#285: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:628:
+ * this value should not include the length of the
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#286: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:629:
+ * padding or the length of the MAC; the driver will
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#287: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:630:
+ * compute the actual number of bytes over which the
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#288: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:631:
+ * encryption will occur, which will include these
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#303: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:646:
+ /**< Starting point for hash processing, specified as
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#308: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:651:
+ * For CCM and GCM modes of operation, this field is
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#323: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:666:
+ * For CCM and GCM modes of operation, this field is
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#324: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:667:
+ * ignored. The field @ref aad field should be set
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#337: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:680:
+ /**< This points to the location where the digest result
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#338: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:681:
+ * should be inserted (in the case of digest generation)
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#339: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:682:
+ * or where the purported digest exists (in the case of
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#342: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:685:
+ * At session creation time, the client specified the
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#343: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:686:
+ * digest result length with the digest_length member
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#344: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:687:
+ * of the @ref rte_crypto_auth_xform structure. For
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#345: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:688:
+ * physical crypto devices the caller must allocate at
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#346: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:689:
+ * least digest_length of physically contiguous memory
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#362: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:705:
+ /**< Pointer to Additional Authenticated Data (AAD)
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#363: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:706:
+ * needed for authenticated cipher mechanisms (CCM and
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#366: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:709:
+ * The length of the data pointed to by this field is
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#368: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:711:
+ * rte_crypto_auth_xform structure as part of the @ref
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#370: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:713:
+ * This length must not exceed 65535 (2^16-1) bytes.
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#372: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:715:
+ * Specifically for CCM (@ref RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_AES_CCM),
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#375: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:718:
+ * - the nonce should be written starting at an offset
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#376: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:719:
+ * of one byte into the array, leaving room for the
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#377: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:720:
+ * implementation to write in the flags to the first
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#380: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:723:
+ * - the additional authentication data itself should
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#381: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:724:
+ * be written starting at an offset of 18 bytes into
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#382: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:725:
+ * the array, leaving room for the length encoding in
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#385: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:728:
+ * - the array should be big enough to hold the above
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#386: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:729:
+ * fields, plus any padding to round this up to the
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#390: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:733:
+ * Finally, for GCM (@ref RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_AES_GCM), the
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#394: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:737:
+ * - the array must be big enough to hold the AAD, plus
WARNING:LONG_LINE_COMMENT: line over 90 characters
#395: FILE: lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h:738:
+ * any space to round this up to the nearest multiple
total: 0 errors, 42 warnings, 369 lines checked
parent reply other threads:[~2017-06-21 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <20170621074731.45013-20-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170621154907.E54097CF5@dpdk.org \
--to=checkpatch@dpdk.org \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
--cc=test-report@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).