From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 29AF6199B5; Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:22:02 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20170907122033.17983-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> References: <20170907122033.17983-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Olivier Matz Message-Id: <20170907122202.29AF6199B5@dpdk.org> Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2017 14:22:02 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw28454 [PATCH 1/2] ring: increase maximum ring size X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2017 12:22:02 -0000 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/28454 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'beeing' may be misspelled - perhaps 'being'? #15: There is no reason to prevent ring from beeing larger than 0x0FFFFFFF. WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #37: FILE: lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h:177: +#define RTE_RING_SZ_MASK (unsigned)(0x7fffffff) /**< Ring size mask */ total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 8 lines checked