From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 2A5551B1EF; Thu, 28 Sep 2017 16:15:37 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20170928141329.73874-11-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> References: <20170928141329.73874-11-ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Ajit Khaparde Message-Id: <20170928141537.2A5551B1EF@dpdk.org> Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 16:15:37 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw29350 [PATCH v3 10/24] net/bnxt: update status of Rx IP/L4 CKSUM X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 14:15:37 -0000 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/29350 _coding style issues_ CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'rxcmp1' - possible side-effects? #58: FILE: drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_rxr.h:59: +#define RX_CMP_L4_CS_OK(rxcmp1) \ + (((rxcmp1)->flags2 & RX_CMP_L4_CS_BITS) && \ + !((rxcmp1)->errors_v2 & RX_CMP_L4_CS_ERR_BITS)) CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'rxcmp1' - possible side-effects? #66: FILE: drivers/net/bnxt/bnxt_rxr.h:67: +#define RX_CMP_IP_CS_OK(rxcmp1) \ + (((rxcmp1)->flags2 & RX_CMP_IP_CS_BITS) && \ + !((rxcmp1)->errors_v2 & RX_CMP_IP_CS_ERR_BITS)) total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 2 checks, 39 lines checked