[dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw29450 [PATCH v1 3/6] bbdev: test applications

[dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw29450 [PATCH v1 3/6] bbdev: test applications

[checkpatch]

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/29450

_coding style issues_


WARNING:MISSING_BREAK: Possible switch case/default not preceded by break or fallthrough comment
#375: FILE: app/test-bbdev/main.c:254:
+		default:

WARNING:MACRO_WITH_FLOW_CONTROL: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided
#493: FILE: app/test-bbdev/main.h:49:
+#define TEST_ASSERT(cond, msg, ...) do {  \
+		if (!(cond)) {  \
+			printf("TestCase %s() line %d failed: " \
+				msg "
", __func__, __LINE__, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+			return TEST_FAILED;  \
+		} \
+} while (0)

WARNING:MACRO_WITH_FLOW_CONTROL: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided
#502: FILE: app/test-bbdev/main.h:58:
+#define TEST_ASSERT_BUFFERS_ARE_EQUAL(a, b, len, msg, ...) do { \
+	if (memcmp((a), (b), len)) { \
+		printf("TestCase %s() line %d failed: " \
+			msg "
", __func__, __LINE__, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+		rte_memdump(stdout, "Buffer A", (a), len); \
+		rte_memdump(stdout, "Buffer B", (b), len); \
+		return TEST_FAILED; \
+	} \
+} while (0)

WARNING:MACRO_WITH_FLOW_CONTROL: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided
#512: FILE: app/test-bbdev/main.h:68:
+#define TEST_ASSERT_SUCCESS(val, msg, ...) do { \
+		typeof(val) _val = (val); \
+		if (!(_val == 0)) { \
+			printf("TestCase %s() line %d failed (err %d): " \
+				msg "
", __func__, __LINE__, _val, \
+				##__VA_ARGS__); \
+			return TEST_FAILED; \
+		} \
+} while (0)

WARNING:MACRO_WITH_FLOW_CONTROL: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided
#525: FILE: app/test-bbdev/main.h:81:
+#define TEST_ASSERT_NOT_NULL(val, msg, ...) do { \
+		if ((val) == NULL) { \
+			printf("TestCase %s() line %d failed (null): " \
+				msg "
", __func__, __LINE__, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+			return TEST_FAILED;  \
+		} \
+} while (0)

WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#2295: FILE: app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c:151:
+			(unsigned)RTE_MBUF_DEFAULT_BUF_SIZE), socket_id);

WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#2315: FILE: app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c:171:
+			RTE_MAX((unsigned)(ad->nb_queues * num_ops + 1),

WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#2317: FILE: app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c:173:
+			(unsigned)(1.5 * rte_lcore_count() * OPS_CACHE_SIZE + 1)),

WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#3217: FILE: app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c:1073:
+	unsigned i;

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'paramaters' may be misspelled - perhaps 'parameters'?
#4800: FILE: app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_vector.h:92:
+/* fills test vector paramaters based on test file */

total: 0 errors, 10 warnings, 4884 lines checked