From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 4FC8E2BB4; Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:36:57 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20171115083548.18572-1-hhaim@cisco.com> References: <20171115083548.18572-1-hhaim@cisco.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: "Hanoch Haim \(hhaim\)" Message-Id: <20171115083657.4FC8E2BB4@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 09:36:57 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw31378 [PATCH] mbuf: cleanup rte_pktmbuf_lastseg() fix atomic usage X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 08:36:57 -0000 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/31378 _coding style issues_ ERROR:CORRUPTED_PATCH: patch seems to be corrupt (line wrapped?) #24: FILE: lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h:1158: __rte_mbuf_sanity_check(m, 1); WARNING:SUSPECT_CODE_INDENT: suspect code indent for conditional statements (0, 16) #42: FILE: lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h:1332: if (rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(md, -1) == 0) { + rte_pktmbuf_reset_before_free(md); WARNING:SUSPECT_CODE_INDENT: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 8) #63: FILE: lib/librte_mbuf/rte_mbuf.h:1365: + } else if (rte_mbuf_refcnt_update(m, -1) == 0) { [...] if (RTE_MBUF_INDIRECT(m)) total: 1 errors, 2 warnings, 52 lines checked