From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id CB350199B4; Thu, 7 Dec 2017 22:41:37 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1512682857-79467-1-git-send-email-amr.mokhtar@intel.com> References: <1512682857-79467-1-git-send-email-amr.mokhtar@intel.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Amr Mokhtar Message-Id: <20171207214137.CB350199B4@dpdk.org> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 22:41:37 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw31990 [PATCH v3 1/5] bbdev: librte_bbdev library X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Dec 2017 21:41:37 -0000 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/31990 _coding style issues_ WARNING:MAINTAINERS_STYLE: MAINTAINERS entries use one tab after TYPE: #55: FILE: MAINTAINERS:276: +M: Amr Mokhtar WARNING:MAINTAINERS_STYLE: MAINTAINERS entries use one tab after TYPE: #56: FILE: MAINTAINERS:277: +F: lib/librte_bbdev/ WARNING:MAINTAINERS_STYLE: MAINTAINERS entries use one tab after TYPE: #57: FILE: MAINTAINERS:278: +F: drivers/bbdev/ WARNING:MAINTAINERS_STYLE: MAINTAINERS entries use one tab after TYPE: #58: FILE: MAINTAINERS:279: +F: app/test-bbdev WARNING:MAINTAINERS_STYLE: MAINTAINERS entries use one tab after TYPE: #59: FILE: MAINTAINERS:280: +F: examples/bbdev_app/ WARNING:MAINTAINERS_STYLE: MAINTAINERS entries use one tab after TYPE: #60: FILE: MAINTAINERS:281: +F: doc/guides/bbdevs/ WARNING:MAINTAINERS_STYLE: MAINTAINERS entries use one tab after TYPE: #61: FILE: MAINTAINERS:282: +F: doc/guides/prog_guide/bbdev.rst WARNING:MAINTAINERS_STYLE: MAINTAINERS entries use one tab after TYPE: #62: FILE: MAINTAINERS:283: +F: doc/guides/sample_app_ug/bbdev_app.rst WARNING:MAINTAINERS_STYLE: MAINTAINERS entries use one tab after TYPE: #63: FILE: MAINTAINERS:284: +F: doc/guides/tools/testbbdev.rst WARNING:MACRO_WITH_FLOW_CONTROL: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided #258: FILE: lib/librte_bbdev/rte_bbdev.c:59: +#define VALID_DEV_OR_RET_ERR(dev, dev_id) do { \ + if (dev == NULL) { \ + rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "device %u is invalid", dev_id); \ + return -ENODEV; \ + } \ +} while (0) WARNING:MACRO_WITH_FLOW_CONTROL: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided #266: FILE: lib/librte_bbdev/rte_bbdev.c:67: +#define VALID_DEV_OPS_OR_RET_ERR(dev, dev_id) do { \ + if (dev->dev_ops == NULL) { \ + rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "NULL dev_ops structure in device %u", \ + dev_id); \ + return -ENODEV; \ + } \ +} while (0) WARNING:MACRO_WITH_FLOW_CONTROL: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided #275: FILE: lib/librte_bbdev/rte_bbdev.c:76: +#define VALID_FUNC_OR_RET_ERR(func, dev_id) do { \ + if (func == NULL) { \ + rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "device %u does not support %s", \ + dev_id, #func); \ + return -ENOTSUP; \ + } \ +} while (0) WARNING:MACRO_WITH_FLOW_CONTROL: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided #284: FILE: lib/librte_bbdev/rte_bbdev.c:85: +#define VALID_QUEUE_OR_RET_ERR(queue_id, dev) do { \ + if (queue_id >= dev->data->num_queues) { \ + rte_bbdev_log(ERR, "Invalid queue_id %u for device %u", \ + queue_id, dev->data->dev_id); \ + return -ERANGE; \ + } \ +} while (0) total: 0 errors, 13 warnings, 3320 lines checked