From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 63AFE1B021; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:25:11 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <18c01491a351b4c6c2fd77177f19da1f065ec3dc.1513592582.git.nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> References: <18c01491a351b4c6c2fd77177f19da1f065ec3dc.1513592582.git.nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: =?utf-8?q?N=C3=A9lio_Laranjeiro?= Message-Id: <20171218102511.63AFE1B021@dpdk.org> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:25:11 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw32355 [PATCH v5 3/3] examples/ipsec-secgw: add Egress flow actions X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 10:25:11 -0000 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/32355 _coding style issues_ WARNING:SUSPECT_CODE_INDENT: suspect code indent for conditional statements (24, 40) #37: FILE: examples/ipsec-secgw/ipsec.c:258: + } else if (sa->attr.egress && [...] + sa->action[1].type = total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 13 lines checked