From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 270E01B81A; Thu, 8 Feb 2018 17:36:00 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1518107653-15466-4-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com> References: <1518107653-15466-4-git-send-email-matan@mellanox.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Matan Azrad Message-Id: <20180208163600.270E01B81A@dpdk.org> Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2018 17:36:00 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw35072 [PATCH v5 3/3] net/failsafe: fix calling device during RMV events X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2018 16:36:00 -0000 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/35072 _coding style issues_ CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 's' - possible side-effects? #184: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h:255: +#define FOREACH_SUBDEV_STATE_UNSAFE(s, i, dev, state) \ + for (s = fs_find_next((dev), 0, state, 0, &i); \ + s != NULL; \ + s = fs_find_next((dev), i + 1, state, 0, &i)) CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'i' - possible side-effects? #184: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h:255: +#define FOREACH_SUBDEV_STATE_UNSAFE(s, i, dev, state) \ + for (s = fs_find_next((dev), 0, state, 0, &i); \ + s != NULL; \ + s = fs_find_next((dev), i + 1, state, 0, &i)) CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'dev' - possible side-effects? #184: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h:255: +#define FOREACH_SUBDEV_STATE_UNSAFE(s, i, dev, state) \ + for (s = fs_find_next((dev), 0, state, 0, &i); \ + s != NULL; \ + s = fs_find_next((dev), i + 1, state, 0, &i)) CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'state' - possible side-effects? #184: FILE: drivers/net/failsafe/failsafe_private.h:255: +#define FOREACH_SUBDEV_STATE_UNSAFE(s, i, dev, state) \ + for (s = fs_find_next((dev), 0, state, 0, &i); \ + s != NULL; \ + s = fs_find_next((dev), i + 1, state, 0, &i)) total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 4 checks, 171 lines checked