From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
To: test-report@dpdk.org
Cc: Vladimir Medvedkin <medvedkinv@gmail.com>
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw35333 [PATCH v2 1/2] Add RIB library
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 22:09:57 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180221210957.72C0E1B01C@dpdk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1519249495-16594-2-git-send-email-medvedkinv@gmail.com>
Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/35333
_coding style issues_
WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line)
#26:
- For dir24_8 implementation it is possible to remove rte_lpm_tbl_entry.depth
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#165: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_dir24_8.c:37:
+ uint64_t *next_hops, const unsigned n) \
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#170: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_dir24_8.c:42:
+ uint32_t prefetch_offset = RTE_MIN((unsigned)bulk_prefetch, n); \
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#699: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_dir24_8.h:83:
+ uint64_t *next_hops, const unsigned n);
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#701: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_dir24_8.h:85:
+ uint64_t *next_hops, const unsigned n);
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#703: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_dir24_8.h:87:
+ uint64_t *next_hops, const unsigned n);
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#705: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_dir24_8.h:89:
+ uint64_t *next_hops, const unsigned n);
WARNING:MACRO_WITH_FLOW_CONTROL: Macros with flow control statements should be avoided
#1285: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_rib.h:15:
+#define RTE_RIB_RETURN_IF_TRUE(cond, retval) do { \
+ if (cond) \
+ return retval; \
+} while (0)
WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned'
#1358: FILE: lib/librte_rib/rte_rib.h:88:
+ uint64_t *next_hops, const unsigned n);
total: 0 errors, 9 warnings, 1520 lines checked
parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-21 21:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <1519249495-16594-2-git-send-email-medvedkinv@gmail.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180221210957.72C0E1B01C@dpdk.org \
--to=checkpatch@dpdk.org \
--cc=medvedkinv@gmail.com \
--cc=test-report@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).