From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 30E374CC3; Thu, 6 Sep 2018 07:56:08 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20180906055449.21731-3-g.singh@nxp.com> References: <20180906055449.21731-3-g.singh@nxp.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Gagandeep Singh Message-Id: <20180906055608.30E374CC3@dpdk.org> Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2018 07:56:08 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw44317 [2/3] net/enetc: add ENETC PMD with basic operations X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2018 05:56:08 -0000 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/44317 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'intialisation' may be misspelled - perhaps 'initialisation'? #20: hardware intialisation CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'txq' may be better as '(txq)' to avoid precedence issues #287: FILE: drivers/net/enetc/base/enetc_hw.h:130: +#define ENETC_TX_ADDR(txq, addr) ((void *)(txq->enetc_txbdr + addr)) CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'addr' may be better as '(addr)' to avoid precedence issues #287: FILE: drivers/net/enetc/base/enetc_hw.h:130: +#define ENETC_TX_ADDR(txq, addr) ((void *)(txq->enetc_txbdr + addr)) CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'reg' may be better as '(reg)' to avoid precedence issues #472: FILE: drivers/net/enetc/enetc.h:89: +#define ENETC_GET_HW_ADDR(reg, addr) ((void *)(reg + addr)) CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'addr' may be better as '(addr)' to avoid precedence issues #472: FILE: drivers/net/enetc/enetc.h:89: +#define ENETC_GET_HW_ADDR(reg, addr) ((void *)(reg + addr)) total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 736 lines checked