From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 5AE4F2BA5; Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:26:05 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20190118152326.22686-3-gage.eads@intel.com> References: <20190118152326.22686-3-gage.eads@intel.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Gage Eads Message-Id: <20190118152605.5AE4F2BA5@dpdk.org> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 16:26:05 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw49954 [v3, 2/5] ring: add a non-blocking implementation X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:26:05 -0000 Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/49954 _coding style issues_ WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #343: FILE: lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h:323: + for (i = 0; i < (n & ((~(unsigned)0x3))); i += 4, idx += 4) { \ WARNING:UNSPECIFIED_INT: Prefer 'unsigned int' to bare use of 'unsigned' #393: FILE: lib/librte_ring/rte_ring.h:397: + for (i = 0; i < (n & (~(unsigned)0x3)); i += 4, idx += 4) {\ total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 805 lines checked ERROR: symbol rte_ring_get_memsize is added in the DPDK_19.05 section, but is expected to be added in the EXPERIMENTAL section of the version map