From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE16A0613 for ; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:54:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023621BEF0; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:54:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 3DF941BEE7; Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:54:40 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <1569398015-6027-11-git-send-email-viacheslavo@mellanox.com> References: <1569398015-6027-11-git-send-email-viacheslavo@mellanox.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Viacheslav Ovsiienko Message-Id: <20190925075440.3DF941BEE7@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 09:54:40 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw59708 [PATCH 10/12] net/mlx5: extend switch domain searching range X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/59708 _coding style issues_ CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'port_id' - possible side-effects? #101: FILE: drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5.h:687: +#define MLX5_ETH_FOREACH_DEV(port_id) \ + for (port_id = mlx5_eth_find_next(0); \ + port_id < RTE_MAX_ETHPORTS; \ + port_id = mlx5_eth_find_next(port_id + 1)) total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 156 lines checked