From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC58DA0524 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:04:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9DC61D5F8; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:04:59 +0100 (CET) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id E27091D5F3; Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:04:57 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20200128210233.691-1-thinhtr@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20200128210233.691-1-thinhtr@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Thinh Tran Message-Id: <20200128210457.E27091D5F3@dpdk.org> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 22:04:57 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw65283 [PATCH] eal/ppc64: improve rte_rdtsc with ppc_get_timebase X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/65283 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'extention' may be misspelled - perhaps 'extension'? #82: __ppc_get_timebase() is GNU extention and is more efficient total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 40 lines checked