From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738EEA055A for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:42:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6811BFEB; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:42:22 +0100 (CET) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id AA69B1BFE3; Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:42:21 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <1582778348-113547-6-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> References: <1582778348-113547-6-git-send-email-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Nicolas Chautru Message-Id: <20200227044221.AA69B1BFE3@dpdk.org> Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 05:42:21 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw66073 [PATCH v1 05/14] test-bbdev: rename FPGA LTE macros to be more explicit X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/66073 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'explict' may be misspelled - perhaps 'explicit'? #57: Self-contained and cosmetic renaming of macro to be more explict. total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 99 lines checked