From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11CF8A057D for ; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:35:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0988F292D; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:35:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 6ACD3292D; Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:35:31 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20200318202957.18121-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20200318202957.18121-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger Message-Id: <20200318203531.6ACD3292D@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2020 21:35:31 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw66884 [PATCH v2 1/4] net/netvsc: propogate descriptor limits from VF to netvsc X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/66884 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'propogate' may be misspelled - perhaps 'propagate'? #65: Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] net/netvsc: propogate descriptor limits total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 30 lines checked