From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C8DA0562 for ; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:27:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A0711C0B5; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:27:41 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id DCA751C0BD; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:27:39 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20200403062704.3947-1-roland.qi@ucloud.cn> References: <20200403062704.3947-1-roland.qi@ucloud.cn> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: qikai Message-Id: <20200403062739.DCA751C0BD@dpdk.org> Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2020 08:27:39 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw67741 [PATCH] vhost: fix check peer close X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/67741 _coding style issues_ WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line) #50: In process_slave_message_reply(), there is a possibility that receiving a peer close message instead of a real message response. total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 20 lines checked