From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43642A04AD for ; Fri, 1 May 2020 15:51:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB841DA1B; Fri, 1 May 2020 15:51:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id A3DE71DA43; Fri, 1 May 2020 15:51:12 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20200501135018.130315-1-583493798@qq.com> References: <20200501135018.130315-1-583493798@qq.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Pu Xu <583493798@qq.com> Message-Id: <20200501135112.A3DE71DA43@dpdk.org> Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 15:51:12 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw69640 [PATCH] ip_frag: fix fragmenting ipv4 packet with header option X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/69640 _coding style issues_ WARNING:COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE: Possible unwrapped commit description (prefer a maximum 75 chars per line) #62: When fragmenting ipv4 packet, the data offset should be calculated through the ihl field in ip header rather than using sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr). ERROR:CODE_INDENT: code indent should use tabs where possible #84: FILE: lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c:27: + uint16_t len, uint16_t fofs, uint16_t dofs, uint32_t mf)$ WARNING:LEADING_SPACE: please, no spaces at the start of a line #84: FILE: lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c:27: + uint16_t len, uint16_t fofs, uint16_t dofs, uint32_t mf)$ WARNING:LONG_LINE: line over 90 characters #105: FILE: lib/librte_ip_frag/rte_ipv4_fragmentation.c:90: + header_len = (in_hdr->version_ihl & RTE_IPV4_HDR_IHL_MASK) * RTE_IPV4_IHL_MULTIPLIER; total: 1 errors, 3 warnings, 84 lines checked