From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8092AA052B for ; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:45:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B7761C037; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:45:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 3D4BB1BFF5; Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:45:12 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20200730144221.29051-5-manishc@marvell.com> References: <20200730144221.29051-5-manishc@marvell.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Manish Chopra Message-Id: <20200730144512.3D4BB1BFF5@dpdk.org> Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 16:45:12 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw75045 [PATCH v5 4/6] net/qede: add infrastructure support for VF load X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/75045 _coding style issues_ CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'vfid' - possible side-effects? #194: FILE: drivers/net/qede/base/ecore_iov_api.h:17: +#define ECORE_VF_ARRAY_GET_VFID(arr, vfid) \ + (((arr)[(vfid) / 64]) & (1ULL << ((vfid) % 64))) total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 187 lines checked