From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F78A04B1 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 01:12:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533D11BE0C; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 01:12:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id CE0891BEAC; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 01:12:40 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20200825115305.58490-7-huwei013@chinasoftinc.com> References: <20200825115305.58490-7-huwei013@chinasoftinc.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" Message-Id: <20200908231240.CE0891BEAC@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 01:12:40 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw75927 [PATCH 06/11] net/hns3: support a maximun 256 FDIR counter X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/75927 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'maximun' may be misspelled - perhaps 'maximum'? #33: Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/11] net/hns3: support a maximun 256 FDIR total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 17 lines checked