From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19513A04B1 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:25:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F117B1C0D8; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:25:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 29B5D1C0D2; Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:25:05 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <20200909092339.31488-5-huwei013@chinasoftinc.com> References: <20200909092339.31488-5-huwei013@chinasoftinc.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: "Wei Hu (Xavier)" Message-Id: <20200909092505.29B5D1C0D2@dpdk.org> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2020 11:25:05 +0200 (CEST) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw77021 [PATCH v2 4/8] net/hns3: add simple Tx process function X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/77021 _coding style issues_ CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'txq' - possible side-effects? #538: FILE: drivers/net/hns3/hns3_rxtx.h:389: +#define HNS3_GET_TX_QUEUE_PEND_BD_NUM(txq) \ + ((txq)->nb_tx_desc - 1 - (txq)->tx_bd_ready) total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1 checks, 454 lines checked