From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2DFA04E7 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:57:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D3937B4; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:57:07 +0100 (CET) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 1017) id 440FE3772; Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:57:06 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <20201110225544.1876-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> References: <20201110225544.1876-2-stephen@networkplumber.org> To: test-report@dpdk.org Cc: Stephen Hemminger Message-Id: <20201110225706.440FE3772@dpdk.org> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2020 23:57:06 +0100 (CET) From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw83923 [PATCH v10 1/7] eal: replace usage of blacklist/whitelist in enum X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "test-report" Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/83923 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'blacklist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'blocklist'? #86: The old names relating to blacklist and whitelist are replaced WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'whitelist' may be misspelled - perhaps 'allowlist'? #86: The old names relating to blacklist and whitelist are replaced WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'WHITELIST' may be misspelled - perhaps 'ALLOWLIST'? #148: FILE: lib/librte_eal/include/rte_bus.h:223: +#define RTE_BUS_SCAN_WHITELIST RTE_BUS_SCAN_ALLOWLIST WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'BLACKLIST' may be misspelled - perhaps 'BLOCKLIST'? #149: FILE: lib/librte_eal/include/rte_bus.h:224: +#define RTE_BUS_SCAN_BLACKLIST RTE_BUS_SCAN_BLOCKLIST total: 0 errors, 4 warnings, 76 lines checked