From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9386A0524
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 19:35:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E60141410;
	Sun, 11 Apr 2021 19:35:24 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39C8C1413F6
 for <test-report@dpdk.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 19:35:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534)
 id 4BACD1208AA; Sun, 11 Apr 2021 19:35:22 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20210411173414.12568-2-getelson@nvidia.com>
References: <20210411173414.12568-2-getelson@nvidia.com>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Cc: Gregory Etelson <getelson@nvidia.com>
Message-Id: <20210411173522.4BACD1208AA@dpdk.org>
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 19:35:22 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw91073 [PATCH v2 1/2] ethdev: add
 packet integrity checks
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "test-report" <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/91073

_coding style issues_


WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'currenlty' may be misspelled - perhaps 'currently'?
#135: 
Since currenlty rte_flow works in positive way the assumtion is

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'assumtion' may be misspelled - perhaps 'assumption'?
#135: 
Since currenlty rte_flow works in positive way the assumtion is

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'postive' may be misspelled - perhaps 'positive'?
#136: 
that the postive way will be the common way in this case also.

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'Flexability' may be misspelled - perhaps 'Flexibility'?
#145: 
6. Flexability.

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'doens' may be misspelled - perhaps 'does'?
#181: 
3. l3_ok - all check flor layer 2 have passed. If packet doens't have

WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'shoudl' may be misspelled - perhaps 'should'?
#182: 
   l3 layer this check shoudl fail.

total: 0 errors, 6 warnings, 84 lines checked