From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F067A0C53
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Wed,  1 Sep 2021 07:43:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B07740DF7;
	Wed,  1 Sep 2021 07:43:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35B840687
 for <test-report@dpdk.org>; Wed,  1 Sep 2021 07:43:02 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534)
 id BC06B1226B3; Wed,  1 Sep 2021 07:43:02 +0200 (CEST)
In-Reply-To: <20210901053044.109901-2-xuan.ding@intel.com>
References: <20210901053044.109901-2-xuan.ding@intel.com>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Cc: Xuan Ding <xuan.ding@intel.com>
Message-Id: <20210901054302.BC06B1226B3@dpdk.org>
Date: Wed,  1 Sep 2021 07:43:02 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: [dpdk-test-report] |WARNING| pw97661 [PATCH 1/2] vfio: allow
 partially unmapping adjacent memory
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "test-report" <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/97661

_coding style issues_


WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'adjancent' may be misspelled - perhaps 'adjacent'?
#58: 
one go. In other words, given segments A and B that are adjancent, it

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 451 lines checked