From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <test-report-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B1242829
	for <public@inbox.dpdk.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 23:36:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D68A40689;
	Thu, 23 Mar 2023 23:36:12 +0100 (CET)
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197])
 by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E7D74111C
 for <test-report@dpdk.org>; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 23:36:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534)
 id 821FC120A07; Thu, 23 Mar 2023 23:36:05 +0100 (CET)
Subject: |WARNING| pw125474 [PATCH v2 6/7] net/null: replace rte atomics with
 GCC builtin atomics
In-Reply-To: <1679610881-25997-7-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
References: <1679610881-25997-7-git-send-email-roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
To: test-report@dpdk.org
From: checkpatch@dpdk.org
Cc: Tyler Retzlaff <roretzla@linux.microsoft.com>
Message-Id: <20230323223605.821FC120A07@dpdk.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 23:36:05 +0100 (CET)
X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports <test-report.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/test-report/>
List-Post: <mailto:test-report@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/test-report>,
 <mailto:test-report-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org

Test-Label: checkpatch
Test-Status: WARNING
http://dpdk.org/patch/125474

_coding style issues_


ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#82: FILE: drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c:104:
+	// NOTE: review for potential ordering optimization

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#92: FILE: drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c:132:
+	// NOTE: review for potential ordering optimization

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#102: FILE: drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c:157:
+	// NOTE: review for potential ordering optimization

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#112: FILE: drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c:180:
+	// NOTE: review for potential ordering optimization

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#121: FILE: drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c:323:
+		// NOTE: review for atomic access

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#132: FILE: drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c:333:
+		// NOTE: review for atomic access

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#144: FILE: drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c:356:
+		// NOTE: review for atomic access

ERROR:C99_COMMENTS: do not use C99 // comments
#148: FILE: drivers/net/null/rte_eth_null.c:359:
+		// NOTE: review for atomic access

total: 8 errors, 0 warnings, 0 checks, 79 lines checked