From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD59742BB5 for ; Sat, 27 May 2023 14:08:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9EE242D38; Sat, 27 May 2023 14:08:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.24.197]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12D014114A for ; Sat, 27 May 2023 14:08:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dpdk.org (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 0F19C120927; Sat, 27 May 2023 14:08:01 +0200 (CEST) Subject: |WARNING| pw127620 [PATCH v5 16/21] pdcp: add timer expiry handle In-Reply-To: <20230527085910.972-17-anoobj@marvell.com> References: <20230527085910.972-17-anoobj@marvell.com> To: test-report@dpdk.org From: checkpatch@dpdk.org Cc: Anoob Joseph Message-Id: <20230527120801.0F19C120927@dpdk.org> Date: Sat, 27 May 2023 14:08:01 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic DPDK test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: test-report-bounces@dpdk.org Test-Label: checkpatch Test-Status: WARNING http://dpdk.org/patch/127620 _coding style issues_ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'REORD' may be misspelled - perhaps 'RECORD'? #91: and PDCP internal state variables (like RX_REORD, RX_DELIV etc) will be WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'REORD' may be misspelled - perhaps 'RECORD'? #115: FILE: doc/guides/prog_guide/pdcp_lib.rst:137: +transmitted in the packet. It utilizes state variables such as RX_REORD, WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'REORD' may be misspelled - perhaps 'RECORD'? #168: FILE: lib/pdcp/rte_pdcp.c:270: + /* - all stored PDCP SDU(s) with associated COUNT value(s) < RX_REORD; */ WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'reord' may be misspelled - perhaps 'record'? #169: FILE: lib/pdcp/rte_pdcp.c:271: + nb_out = pdcp_reorder_up_to_get(&dl->reorder, out_mb, capacity, en_priv->state.rx_reord); WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'REORD' may be misspelled - perhaps 'RECORD'? #175: FILE: lib/pdcp/rte_pdcp.c:277: + * RX_REORD; WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'REORD' may be misspelled - perhaps 'RECORD'? #182: FILE: lib/pdcp/rte_pdcp.c:284: + * to upper layers, with COUNT value >= RX_REORD; WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'reord' may be misspelled - perhaps 'record'? #184: FILE: lib/pdcp/rte_pdcp.c:286: + en_priv->state.rx_deliv = en_priv->state.rx_reord + nb_seq; WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'REORD' may be misspelled - perhaps 'RECORD'? #188: FILE: lib/pdcp/rte_pdcp.c:290: + * - update RX_REORD to RX_NEXT; WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'reord' may be misspelled - perhaps 'record'? #192: FILE: lib/pdcp/rte_pdcp.c:294: + en_priv->state.rx_reord = en_priv->state.rx_next; WARNING:TYPO_SPELLING: 'REORD' may be misspelled - perhaps 'RECORD'? #232: FILE: lib/pdcp/rte_pdcp.h:351: + * window by updating state variables such as RX_REORD & RX_DELIV. PDCP would total: 0 errors, 10 warnings, 144 lines checked