From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA8A12BA0 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:55:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id r129so130377072wmr.1 for ; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 03:55:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QIVN3a05isQQFWfuvwoBbopkSnS7V+BhNtAuu9/juJ8=; b=coUnsmtN67fUL3evUjVCvoH+ZpElqmvwQVsrX0RfPfbKko6eatz9ltsP2Aw8cyjTvI HL4sNKeLLhmXr+iYTGoRmCaN5pzQo2GJ2pTRkhfwMernqvqjydtSILf20bIlPaWRjZl9 LtSAf6TMUyX8vwkxA1Jn4WpXLpDgm/BbOU5xuK3pGv/y0jYJTG2IIc2/Nvptj3OWoEHn tfBXlLpnazBf/4QDr+JMy3Qf56ahJVbciPpcSIENBWwUiuphKu30eOkmc7YnpBMpnDWY 5FvmdWJ5tNueH2JVJ62A0YYxZR3/jI0GBZKrkrdvAWX7wIHAtbLVGsC0anh55bQfW/rD 0TPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=QIVN3a05isQQFWfuvwoBbopkSnS7V+BhNtAuu9/juJ8=; b=IS0Dgpo9kLjQ2iIsymKpGZX0cosOlgCu0N45Yaf+oOiw/Cx87hj+G3w0klDFl2tn3S FUBokedbjHK9PWSUzr+D/QmepKIrC/vfs3uFzYRm6JzqrJC7dp8aGP4qwETca6KvVRhG FwJjY9DU634l4+sjnIvNAxtf77BIPqmEsdXhAAV0josFEzYVAZU9PccxokqHL2CqMwQS PrENSVB7S1Ae7hg9gEJwfvmtutluDd+J/xDtfYWVd5Ud8AdrYajOnlPl8JKSFFwRDTGK 6yrHQTkAYat8wjX0jKmKNF9NksgLWS7aCEV4EY+gzNS5fMy7I09IbuEhDqyZhqL9vSiC JR+w== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLKLbF5auE0OoK0VB3dUT5sCxSlgvfZ++mTRYQMTtMYZNMKxtIeKH5iOXSIaR1sg7EK X-Received: by 10.28.238.210 with SMTP id j79mr3194425wmi.23.1458730529770; Wed, 23 Mar 2016 03:55:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (91.111.75.86.rev.sfr.net. [86.75.111.91]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v2sm2334260wmd.24.2016.03.23.03.55.28 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 23 Mar 2016 03:55:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: sys_stv@intel.com, waterman.cao@intel.com Cc: dpdk_sw_eng@intel.com, npg.sw.core.tools.prc@intel.com, test-report@dpdk.org Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:53:48 +0100 Message-ID: <2097148.SushTU6EDT@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <0416cf$242sbk@fmsmga004.fm.intel.com> References: <0416cf$242sbk@fmsmga004.fm.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 11:56:04 +0100 Subject: Re: [dpdk-test-report] | ERROR | daily Intel builds (29/47) X-BeenThere: test-report@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: automatic test reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:55:30 -0000 2016-03-22 15:00, sys_stv@intel.com: > Last commit Time : Tue Mar 22 20:46:53 2016 +0100 > Last Author : Thomas Monjalon I am not the author. Please fix it. The author is retrieved with git log -1 --format='%an' > Failure #18 > OS : FC21_32 / 3.18.8-201 > Compiler : GCC 4.9.2 > Build Configuration: i686-native-linuxapp-gcc > CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_PCAP=y, > CONFIG_RTE_NIC_BYPASS=y, > CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB=y, > CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST=y > > Makefile:54: *** The RTE_TARGET chosen is not compatible with this environment (x86_64), for this application. Please change the definition of the RTE_TARGET environment variable, or run the application on a 32-bit OS. Stop. > DPDK/mk/rte.extsubdir.mk:46: recipe for target 'dpdk_qat' failed > DPDK/mk/rte.sdkexamples.mk:52: recipe for target 'i686-native-linuxapp-gcc_examples' failed > DPDK/mk/rte.sdkroot.mk:119: recipe for target 'examples' failed Please put a clear separation between failures and success. > UBT144_32 / Linux 3.13.0-30 / GCC 4.8.2 There are some double spaces here. > Config: i686-native-linuxapp-gcc > CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PMD_PCAP=y, > CONFIG_RTE_NIC_BYPASS=y, > CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB=y, > CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_VHOST=y This presentation is simple and good. Why it is different in failure cases?